Jump to content



  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by george7378

  1. Hey everyone, I feel like I've got a good workflow down for processing my astro images, but there's one thing that's still bugging me - background (or gradient) removal. The only tool I've found that offers to do it so far is IRIS, and while their 'remove gradient (polynomial)' works well for some photos, on others it seems to just add to the overall noise. For example, here's an M101 from last night with a visible background gradient from the top left: If I could get rid of the gradient, I think this would be a really decent photo. So, if I run it through IRIS and their gr
  2. Thanks for the replies. Yep - I'm actually just happy getting something I can share and play with right now! I am keen to try M33 again though, with a few more shots stacked together. Regarding the stacking - I'm not 100% sure, no. I was using DeepSkyStacker with default settings, and I had 30 lights and 15 each of dark, bias and flat. The M31 photo above is just one of my lights from this session. The final stacked photo preview in DSS looks pretty workable: ...but when I load Autosave.tif into GIMP, it looks terrible: I tried adjusting curves, levels, exposure,
  3. Thanks for looking, and for the kind replies! I've got a couple more quickies - M33 and M1 (same kit, same settings):
  4. Hey everyone! I thought I'd share my first ever DSO images. I'm pleased with them, since they are all single-shot files; I tried stacking with darks, flats, bias, etc... using DeepSkyStacker, but I actually preferred the single-shot edits to the end result. Both are taken with my Canon 1100D DSLR, and they are 3 minute shots at ISO 1600. My setup is also pretty simple - a Sky-Watcher 130PDS on an EQ-5 with just a simple motor on the RA axis. Thanks for looking! I'm hoping to get some other, fainter objects in due course including M81/M82, M33, M1 and a cluster or two.
  5. Oh yeah, good idea - will have a rummage and see what I can find. I actually like how the whole thing can rest on the spanner though. Might just end up drilling a hole in it and shaving a centimetre off the handle to make it fit nicely!
  6. Hey again! A little update on this, as the drive came today and I've just finished fitting it to the mount. It looks like a decent piece of kit, but it actually doesn't quite fit the SkyWatcher EQ5 out of the box without a bit of 'MacGyvering'. If you screw motor directly onto the mount, the gears won't actually mesh together. In order to get everything to line up, I had to put a metal spacer between the mount and the motor. One of the spanners that came with my telescope works OK. I also had to move the motor's gear out along the shaft to line it up with the one on the RA shaft. Hav
  7. Hey everyone, It's been a while and I'm thinking of getting a new setup, based around an EQ5 mount. I'm also hoping to motorise the RA axis, and of course the natural choice would be this motor. I did however come across the Orion TrueTrack motor which is way cheaper, looks to be almost the same and claims to fit the Sky-Watcher EQ5 perfectly. Can anyone confirm if the TrueTrack motor does fit the EQ5 out of the box? How is the quality? Thanks for the help
  8. Thanks for the replies yeah, the sky from the Indian Ocean is something I can remember really well from holidays when I was young. It was the first thing I wanted to see again when I went back last year! thanks for the encouragement! One thing I can do here is watch for the ISS and broghter satellites, I'll try and capture a few passes as I still have my camera.
  9. Hi everyone, It's been years since I posted anything on this forum! It's also been years since I've had a proper observing session as I've had uni, work and other things to think about. Also now that I live in London it's unlikely I can do any proper observing! Anyway I've been missing it lately, and thought I'd pay a visit to this forum again, starting with a simple little Milky Way image I took on holiday last year: Here's hoping that in a year or two I'll be able to think about setting myself up with a telescope in a nice dark place again
  10. Hi everyone, I have the position of a satellite in topocentric cartesian coordinates (i.e. the position of the satellite is given in [x,y,z] coordinates with the Earth-bound observer at the origin) and I want to convert this to and RA and Dec position as seen by the observer. I have seen formulae on this site: http://www.castor2.ca/04_Propagation...uat/index.html ...and the one for declination works fine, but the RA formula sometimes gives me a number larger than 360 (I'm working in degrees rather than hours) and even when I subtract 360 it isn't correct. This seems to happen about half the ti
  11. Thanks a lot Actually Gary, this was my first try at a shot like this, and I guess I just got lucky! It was just a point and shoot job! summerstars - how did it go?
  12. Since the ISS was going to be crossing the Moon in full illumination, I wanted to try and get a widefield shot. I think it worked! The station was visible the whole time as it flew across the crescent moon at full brightness. Taken with a Canon 1100D, 30 seconds @ ISO 400 and f/9.0
  13. I saw Panstarrs for the first time tonight! It was amazing next to M31, and I got some decent photos of it. The binocular view was great too, especially with the trees to frame the comet!
  14. It's not a Comet Panstarrs post, sorry! I took these tonight - some widefields of the western horizon, and a special visitor - an unexpectedly bright flare from Metop-A as it flies over to the north:
  15. The likelihood is that if two neutron stars collide, the degeneracy pressure supporting them will not be strong enough to overcome their gravitational collapse and they will explode as a type 1a supernova.
  16. george7378


    Perfect definition!
  17. Absolutely perfect - is that faint halo of nebulosity surrounding the main galaxy actually part of M31?
  18. There's some lovely shadowing in there - reminds me of the view through large binoculars or my telescope with the 25mm eyepiece. I prefer the stacked image BTW!
  19. Beautiful! The layer on the bottom photo really lets me visualise the Sun in 3D. That's a lot of sunspot numbers
  20. The amateur Jupiter images are getting better all the time, congrats I love seeing how they evolve over the years I've spent on this forum!
  21. I've been wondering the same thing for years - every time I come round to thinking about buying I always manage to talk myself out of it (it just seems too expensive). I should probably look through one first though before I make judgement!
  22. Thanks I think this is my favourite type of astrophotography - seeing shots of the Milky Way over the Earth's terrain is always awesome!
  23. Here are a few photos I took with my 1100D yesterday - each one is pretty much unedited apart from curves and basic levels. Here's a description of each one: 1. A cloudy Orion with Jupiter framed against some trees with a plane on the bottom right (30 secs @ ISO800 f/3.5) 2. The Plough sitting above the trees looking through the clouds. (30 secs @ ISO800 f/3.5) 3. The 'HK-1C' rocket pulsing as it flies past M31 in the early evening. (30 secs @ ISO400 (I think) f/3.5) 4. Orion and Jupiter looking through the lit foreground trees. (30 secs @ ISO800 f/3.5) Thanks for looking, I'm really enjoying
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.