Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

what are these caused by?


Recommended Posts

They are hot pixels , you didn't take any dark frames to eliminate them I'm guessing.

Steve.

Not convinced to be honest, seen a lot of hot pixels, but never similar groups/patterns like that.

As per James, when do you first see them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The grouping is identical , leads me to say that the frames weren't shot with accurate tracking , DSS has aligned the stars and therefore the pixels appear to have moved around.

I get the same thing if tracking's off , usually a line of hotties where the scope has drifted , that's what convinced me to start taking dark frames........ :p

Steve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They look just like hot pixels to me. I've seen the effect when dithering and the SD mask hasn't worked.

Is this a stack of 10 subs ? Does each sub show 1 hot pixel in that area ? Which stacking program ?

If it's not hot pixels then I've no idea.

Dave.

Posted at the same time :) SD mask in Maxim should work with 10 subs but pixel rejection in DSS may not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i didnt use DSS i used nebulosity3 there not the snigle subs, as for hot pixels the cameras cooled ?? hummm... :icon_scratch:

Cooling does not remove all hot pixels, sorry :)

My Atik at -5 to -10 still has 5 or so hot pixels.

I honestly find DSS to do a better job on hot pixels than Nebulosity, but I might be missing a step in my processing with Neb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.