michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 These people have some NLV models at around half price. Not the 9mm, unfortunately.:AccessoriesThanks, but after buying the Nagler 31T5 off Paulo (pvaz) I am first looking for a 12T4 to replace the 14mm UWA (eye relief too small, otherwise an outstanding EP). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Spock Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 These people have some NLV models at around half price. Not the 9mm, unfortunately.:AccessoriesThanks for the tip - just saved me £50! I wanted a 12mm to go with the 10mm I just ordered from FLO. So now I am complete: I have the 12mm, 10mm and 9mm for my planetary viewing (x196, x235, x261) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Spock Posted November 25, 2011 Share Posted November 25, 2011 I've just had an e-mail from TelescopeOutlet to say the eyepiece has shipped - crikey, that was fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
great_bear Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 The NLV is much more recent than the LV (which I always liked)Oh blimey! - I always thought they were the same eyepiece! The NLVs have gone right under my radar. Mind you - mighty pricey and a lot of elements for a 50-degree EP... One to put on my "EPs to look through" list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted November 26, 2011 Share Posted November 26, 2011 Thanks for the tip - just saved me £50! I wanted a 12mm to go with the 10mm I just ordered from FLO. So now I am complete: I have the 12mm, 10mm and 9mm for my planetary viewing (x196, x235, x261) No problem - glad it was of use Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
E621Keith Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Enjoyed reading your report Michael. Also thanks to Brantuk for his advice (again). I have decided to go with the 8mm Radian.If you are considering the 8mm Radian, may be you should also consider the Pentax XF 8.5mmIt's £60 cheaper than the Radian and potentially better according to this CN review.12mm Radian and 12mm Pentax XF - Review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
great_bear Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Oh blimey! - I always thought they were the same eyepiece! Update: Ah... Turns out I was right all along. They are the same eyepiece - just set in a newer housing, that's all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Update: Ah... Turns out I was right all along. They are the same eyepiece - just set in a newer housing, that's all...What about the coatings? Improving the coatings could explain the observed differences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag72 Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 I'm glad that I've seen this thread and know now what BGO stands for!I currently have a 17mm and 8mm Baader Hyperion. I think I'd love to see a better view of Jupiter, it's really a little small in my 8mm. So I was thinking about a 5mm BGO. I am using a SW Evostar 120ED - Any thoughts on this? Good EP for me? When I looked at the FOV calculator the 5mm BGO gave a much bigger Jupiter than the equivalent Hyperion - Hence my thinking as bigger is better right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
great_bear Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Improving the coatings could explain the observed differences.Can't rule it out - then again that's true of any eyepiece line.For example - returning to BGOs for the moment - I've heard people say they've owned a BGO and a UO-HD and seen differences not just in the coatings but also in the apparent field of view. Then later I read a post by someone who observed the same differences between - not a UO and a BGO - but TWO different 12.5mm BGOs! It seems at some point that Baader widened the field-stops and changed the coatings - so if buying a pair for binoviewing, they need to be of the same vintage. It also seems likely that it's just as possible to find identical BGO/UO-HD pairs as it is to find mismatched ones - it's not that one brand is better than the other.It's not too much of a stretch to see this may be the case with other eyepiece lines from other manufacturers too. The ubiquitous 26mm Meade 4000 Plossl for example, has no less than six different versions over time - even the current version can have differences between units in its internal build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charon Posted November 27, 2011 Author Share Posted November 27, 2011 If you are considering the 8mm Radian, may be you should also consider the Pentax XF 8.5mmIt's £60 cheaper than the Radian and potentially better according to this CN review.12mm Radian and 12mm Pentax XF - ReviewThanks for that Keith, food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Spock Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 I'm glad that I've seen this thread and know now what BGO stands for!I currently have a 17mm and 8mm Baader Hyperion. I think I'd love to see a better view of Jupiter, it's really a little small in my 8mm. So I was thinking about a 5mm BGO. I am using a SW Evostar 120ED - Any thoughts on this? Good EP for me? When I looked at the FOV calculator the 5mm BGO gave a much bigger Jupiter than the equivalent Hyperion - Hence my thinking as bigger is better right?A 5mm will give you the right magnification for your scope, but at 5mm the eye relief on a BGO will be very short at 4mm. You might prefer something with 20mm eye relief for ease of use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charon Posted November 27, 2011 Author Share Posted November 27, 2011 Has anyone had experience with the Pentax XF eyepiece? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag72 Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 A 5mm will give you the right magnification for your scope, but at 5mm the eye relief on a BGO will be very short at 4mm. You might prefer something with 20mm eye relief for ease of use.WHat would you suggest then as a good 5mm? Will all 5mm give the same magnification and size in the EP? I ask as the FOV calculator didn't suggest that to be the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 I must say I am tempted by the XF 8.5. Two things to keep in mind are on the one hand that it notoriously difficult to rate an eyepiece objectively, and on the other hand that there will be differences between individual EPs of the same type. If two designs are closely matched, two different two-way comparisons may come out differently, simply because of these differences. If different people make the comparison between two different pairs, things are even more complicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charon Posted November 27, 2011 Author Share Posted November 27, 2011 Yes, in other words a certain EP may suit me and might not suit you so to speak. It is a minefield of choice.Sara, I do not think the FOV calculater is that accurate as it does not represent the views I get from my CPC800. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael.h.f.wilkinson Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Yes, in other words a certain EP may suit me and might not suit you so to speak. It is a minefield of choice.Sara, I do not think the FOV calculater is that accurate as it does not represent the views I get from my CPC800.Even worse, one Vixen LV might be better than a particular TV Radian, whereas the same LV may be worse than another Radian of the same focal length. Better and worse in this case refers to very small differences indeed. In this price bracket, there are really only excellent and outstanding EPs. Mine field it may be, but you can't really put a cut seriously wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Spock Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 WHat would you suggest then as a good 5mm? Will all 5mm give the same magnification and size in the EP? I ask as the FOV calculator didn't suggest that to be the case.All 5mm eyepieces will give the same magnification, but may have different field of views.For a similar price to the BGO, the Celestron X-Cel LX is getting good reviews. At a lower price you have TMB Planetarys and BST Explorers. All these are 60° eyepieces with good eye relief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 For example - returning to BGOs for the moment - I've heard people say they've owned a BGO and a UO-HD and seen differences not just in the coatings but also in the apparent field of view. Then later I read a post by someone who observed the same differences between - not a UO and a BGO - but TWO different 12.5mm BGOs!.... I currently have a 5mm University HD ortho and 6mm and 7mm Baader GO's. There are a number of cosmetic differences between the two brands but optically the UO-HD seems identical to the BGO's including coating appearance and function and field stop size. The field stop edge is not quite as sharply defined in the UO-HD as it is in the BGO's but it's quite acceptable IMHO. But, as with all mass produced eyepieces, I'm sure subtle design variations creep in from time to time and there will be some quality variation between individual batches and even units within batches I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
great_bear Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 All 5mm eyepieces will give the same magnificationOn paper yes, but (as you're aware, I'm sure) in practice an OEM eyepiece which one brand relabels as 4.7mm another may simplify to 5mm, or one that's 5.5mm may be similarly rounded down and labeled as 5mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom714uk Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 I'm glad that I've seen this thread and know now what BGO stands for!I currently have a 17mm and 8mm Baader Hyperion. I think I'd love to see a better view of Jupiter, it's really a little small in my 8mm. So I was thinking about a 5mm BGO. I am using a SW Evostar 120ED - Any thoughts on this? Good EP for me? When I looked at the FOV calculator the 5mm BGO gave a much bigger Jupiter than the equivalent Hyperion - Hence my thinking as bigger is better right?A Hyperion has a bigger AFOV but this isn't reflected in the 12dstring calculator's display (if that's what you were using). So Jupiter may appear smaller, but you have to imagine the whole circular image scaled up by the ratio of the two AFOVs, which should make Jupiter the same size if both eyepieces are 5mm.TomSent from my HTC Desire S using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swag72 Posted November 27, 2011 Share Posted November 27, 2011 Excellent Tom - Thanks for that explanation - So maybe I'll get another Hyperion then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.