Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Deadlake

Members
  • Posts

    1,517
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Deadlake

  1. No, it's getting as long as: "How much strehl difference is actually detectable?" on CN It's quite common I'm told by dealers if they sell a scope for 0.98 and it gets reported on CN they get a return because another scope they sold of the same model tests at 0.96. For instance Vixens usual test at 0.96 whereas Takahashi will be higher 0.97 ish. I'm sure the differences being reported are other lens metrics.
  2. How much for the AZ100 goto kit then…
  3. I was hoping someone would do push to encoders.
  4. Now @FLO https://www.firstlightoptics.com/alt-azimuth-astronomy-mounts/scopetech-goto-controller-for-mount-zero.html Wonder if it works with a nexus? No info on weight limit, very portable And hopefully a review https://digiborg.wordpress.com/2021/03/25/scopetech-mount-zero-5/
  5. Until the 100DF mark II comes out and your mate tells you he is going to buy one...😉
  6. We could ask some AP, LZOS or Baader owners if they are insecure too??? 😉
  7. Are you suggesting Takahashi owners are insecure and need to get help 😉 Maybe the fumes of the green paint. 😆 At the end of the day this thread is just about a buyer's opinion on the value of buying a premium refractor.
  8. But good quality APO's are more affordable now than say 10 years ago. At the same time a 4" APO is more space friendly/portable than a Dob, so maybe people are changing there approach??
  9. How sensitive are refractors to seeing and accilmiation when they get over 150 mm in aperture. 100-130 mm APO's are the ultimate grab n'go, but ignoring cost when the refractor gets over 150 mm does it lose it's main advantage as far as setup speed? At that point only collimation (which for some mirrored scopes you might every few years) is the difference?
  10. The score should in these categories: Had a non-premium APO and upgraded and thought the premium scope was worth it. Had a non-premium APO, upgraded and didn't see the benefit. Read the reviews online and bypassed the non-premium APO's I'm sure some people would suggest other metrics, but the surely its about putting your money down or viewing using a premium scope and saying yes it's better to me?
  11. You might want to read this thread on CN https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/609025-vixen-sxd2-w-starbook-10/?hl= sxp2 Good for 75 mins unguided subs, not that you need but gives you an idea of quality. For what it’s worth very happy with the SXP2. Starbook Ten very good for visual use and you an always connect via network. Also whisper quite in operation which is helpfully in the summer to use near the house. SXP2 would hold you current scopes, why go large with AXJ, it weighs a lot more? The strain wave mounts are great but more a version one, so I would wait. Also if you look at Japanese dealers they package Takahashi scopes with vixen mounts,if that helps.
  12. Any idea on weight support, cannot see any listed?
  13. Would the level of light pollution have any difference on viewing? Vixen HR’s do pullout all the detail as well, near 0.99 Strehl at the centre…
  14. The Fresnham big pond car park does indeed close at 9 pm, however you can park further up and walk across to one of the main paths. The little pond car park is open 24 hours however you have to walk around the mound. Its a little cross country to get there, I'd look at Blackdown the other side of Haslemere. If you are going that far you can travel on a little further to Bramshot common.
  15. I was using this for looking at the moon so no trouble with brightness. Also needs a goto mount as even manual mount with slo mo controls shakes to much to focus. I suspect we look at Strehl to much, RMS and PV also should be considered, quality of the figuring..
  16. A Vixen SD103S can take just just under 500x, with a HR 1.6 mm and Zeiss diagonal prims.
  17. It would connect to a 2” nose telescope side to a T2 diagonal side in theory. I’ll let you know.
  18. It’s not turned up, it’s for connecting telescope side UFC 2” to a T2 prism so I can swap between a 2” or T2 diagonal. https://www.baader-planetarium.com/en/downloads/dl/file/id/1617/product/1237/baader_star_diagonals_t_2_and_2.pdf page 16
  19. I know some who looks through his TSA-120 at -25 oC and he doesn’t complain about wonky stars….
  20. It’s just like looking thru an EP, just black and white. And real-time, no need to spend hours collecting and processing the image. However for most DSO not much colour so don’t think much to miss…. As @PeterW says just need to choose focal length to frame object of interest and of course improves any telescope. Easier to drag around an NV intensifier and a 9 “ scope then a 24” dob and a ladder… 😃😃😃
  21. Wait until you look at the Moon with a TOE 4 mm, silky smooth views. Highly recommended. You going to get a turret for the above? The Star book Ten makes touring the skies very easy doesn't it. Only criticism is you cannot upload a viewing list of say double stars, have to use another program for that.
  22. FLO ordered this custom for me: https://www.firstlightoptics.com/adapters/baader-reducing-ring-2i-t-2a-with-15mm-optical-length.html Maybe you should order intake for the next delivery in two weeks.
  23. Is your 16" Dob going to stay on the Isle of Wight or will you bring it back to London light pollution? Wondering if above a certain aperture with NV you need a darker site?
  24. Or a Mewlon or 10" GSO will cool down quicker. A new F3.3 20" is small enough not to need a rolling ladder...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.