Captain Scarlet

Courtesy of @Astro_Gaz a 2” Oiii. Although it touts itself as a CCD filter I thought I’d see what “the whole Veil” looks like through it on my Nagler 31.

Magnus

... observing chair!

This chair has, I suspect, passed through many owners. I myself picked it up saved it from the dump from @Stu about a year ago, and I did fully intend to do likewise for anyone who wanted a top-class IMMACULATE item. But I fear it's met its end. I sheared a bolt when trying to open it out. So sadly I present to you, its final journey:

Magnus 😢 

I believe @jetstream has and likes a Stellarvue refractor…

Magnus

Don't do what I did to a larger bag of silica gel: put it in the microwave for far too long, forget about it and go for a run, only for my wife to discover the bag had caught fire in the microwave! Lucky escape!

Magnus

I too have had to modify my VX8 quite seriously to get it working properly. The tube is, as mentioned, narrow and flexible. The entrance aperture created by the top-ring is exactly 200mm, meaning all off-axis viewing will be vignetted, the more so the more off-axis. I binned my tube and got a Helmerichs carbon one. But the most serious problem I had was the primary mirror centre-spot. It was 3mm away from the centre of the mirror. That guaranteed collimation impossibility. I strongly suspect that was the reason the person I bought it from sold it: a 1/10 OO mirror that produced appalling views. I re-spotted it and all was good. I would check yours if I were you (in fact I would urge all newt owners to check). My OO 300mm also had an off-centre spot, though by not quite as much.

Magnus

14 minutes ago, Stu1smartcookie said:

hmmm red wine , tea and nice cereals ... what statement are you making there , Magnus

 

One needs something to keep breakfast interesting 😁

Just this minute delivered by postwoman, an extender for my az-gti . Funny, when the az-gti arrived it was much bigger than I was expecting. And this pillar is much smaller than I expected!

anyway, many thanks to @heliumstar!

Magnus

16 hours ago, MarkRadice said:

Awesome set up Craig. Looking forward to more of your planetary images this autumn.
 

How does it (and you!) cope with the focuser on the inside? Is that just for balance and will you pivot round for observing? 

I actually use mine with the focuser on the inside, it allows me to rest a finger or two on the top-boss of the mount to keep my head stable. On the outside, especially at higher elevations, the lack of finger or hand rest is inconvenient for me. ( bringing to attention of @CraigT82 too)

Fantastic read. With lovely dark skies, for me it’s the naked eye view that blows me away the most. I’m almost grateful for the LP in cities for being something to let me compare it to.

Magnus

Very nice and the problem-solving must be satisfying!

To truly earn the name Phoenix of course, the original needs to have been set on fire 🙂.

I will be gratefully drawing on your experience when I, very soon now I hope, start building my own 20” dob. I’ve had the mirrors (Nichol) for a year now, and now my house is sold I have the time and the finances!

Magnus

I haven’t organized one myself, but I do recall reading a very useful list of things to consider if there will be any children about. @John posted it a few months ago IIRC. Perhaps he could chime in and point us to it?

Magnus

The skip’s needed to hold the magnetic fields in

I’ve been working for ages on a contact-free anti gravity Newtonian mount, no tripods struts clamps or any of that inconvenient stuff … just pure Levitation. Finally I’ve got it working holding my OO VX8, as you can see here:

… actually it’s me throwing away my old VX8 tube, having replaced it with a Helmerichs carbon one.

Magnus 😜

When you say handheld do you mean literally holding phone up to eyepiece yourself, or using a bracket? If truly handheld I’m impressed you’re a lot better at it than I am!

I can vouch for accu.co.uk, very good indeed domestically.

But from outside the UK, I had a different experience. I ordered £45 worth of various fittings. But cheapest post cost to Ireland was £19 UPS. I ordered anyway it 9 May, it still hasn’t arrived! Tracking was telling me they’d been trying to contact me every day, but I’d had no calls. I checked my details, they were all good. After 3 weeks, I somehow got through to UPS with my tracking number and paid the customs. It indicated that delivery would be the following Monday. Not. Tracking since then has been saying UPS have been trying to contact me every day again!

I’m now in the UK for completion of my house sale, and simply gave up and re-ordered the same batch. It arrived one day later!

Maybe the ones floating around UPS-world in Ireland will reach me, in the meantime I’ll try to call accu and get a refund on the basis of egregious non-delivery. I did contact after that 3 weeks via their “live chat” but all they could say was “it’s up to UPS now, I’m sure they’ll get it to you as soon as possible”. The syntax of the text strongly suggests the live chat was with someone in India (called “Alan” I don’t think) with very little actual link to accu.

Rant over.

As others have intimated, the Star Test for a newt, particularly a fast one, is only useful or valid at or very close to focus at high magnification, where the diffraction rings should be concentric.

Away from focus, far enough that the secondary shadow shows clearly, the offset will and should be apparent and what you're looking at should _not_ be symmetrical. Obviously, the faster the newt, the greater the offset and the more obvious it will be. Under no circumstances should you try to "collimate away" the offset in rough alignment! (such as you might do for a truly symmetrical scope like a mak or SCT).

Cheers, Magnus

Mirror segment hit by micrometeorite, larger than any they modelled...

https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/06/08/webb-engineered-to-endure-micrometeoroid-impacts/

55 minutes ago, mdstuart said:

Another. I wish I had not sold post. Perhaps we need an organisation to buy kit from us when we have to sell it to be allowed another telescope and then held in case we want it back a while down the line

Mark 

I think it’s called a pawn shop. Rates might not be so good though…

Very nice

3 hours ago, ONIKKINEN said:

The Televue Paracorr type 2 that i just bought apparently moves the focal point outwards by 46mm. I have not tested this though as all of my kit is in various stages of repair/maintenance right now.

I have a PC2 and yes that seems about right. I should measure it though I don’t be able to for 6 weeks or so.

Yes meteor storm for me too. Perhaps only because the engraving is the piece of art of those presented above I’d most like to have on my wall!

M

20 minutes ago, markse68 said:

Very interested to hear how this works out for you Magnus. I wonder if there would be any benefit to using a field flattener with it for visual or if that would be even more overkill  https://starizona.com/products/evoff-field-flattener-for-skywatcher-evoguide-50ed

Mark

Mmmm that does look interesting. Never averse to a bit of overkill…

I've finally arrived to where these were delivered. 3 Items. Thanks belatedly to @moriniboy, @WbRaDy and @Richard_B. A Baader SkySurfer V; a SW Evoguide 50ED and an AZ-GTi, one of which which I've wanted for a long time.

I now have 3 Baader SSVs, each one dedicated and dialled-in to a scope. And oddly all 3 are slightly different in their details. They're a real pain to zero in for a new scope, especially in the dark, so I can understand why people might not get on with them. But once dedicated, they really are the last word in RDFs. And I have two Telrads too, not in the same league in my book.

The Evoguide 50ED I plan to apply a little surgery to, to turn it into a mega-finder: I'll shorten the main tube to allow a small RACI diagonal to be attached.

Cheers, Magnus.

19 minutes ago, Stu said:

Magnus ( @Captain Scarlet) uses one of his AZEQ6. It’s got a lightened CF tube but I think the original skywatcher tube worked fine on the mount.

I can’t quite get my head around the observing position of newt on an AltAz but it seems to work. A dob is certainly likely to be quicker and easier to setup though.

Yes indeed. I do need a step or two for the higher elevations but I like the setup.

The pics below are of my old steel-tubed 300p, nearly 28kg all in and no slewing problems. My current 12” is carbon tubed and comes in around 21kg. I’ll be using that tonight I think.

Magnus

5 hours ago, Kon said:

Nice blue skies here at the moment. I am looking forward to some observing on my t-shirt tonight. 

So are the mosquitoes!