Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

6footgeek

Members
  • Posts

    68
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 6footgeek

  1. Oh awesome that’s a great idea - I’ll check that out thanks! Of course it’s either been storms or mad heat at night so I have t actually tested it out in anger but it recognised everything absolutely fine and I’m sold! Now time to get a new cooler zwo camera methinks
  2. Woo! I got one of these this week as well! It’s looking super pretty - I’m gonna add it to the setup shortly
  3. Thanks! I got 15 minutes on it earlier this year without a filter / my mount - just on a star adventurer but it didnt go well! The moon wasnt helping this shot last night at 4am...
  4. Quick edit of an hour capture I got on m42 last night - was meant to be imaging the Western Veil all night, but a windows update on my pc rebooted it just after I went to bed. Anyway at about 4am I remoted in and pointed it at Orion. This is ~ 1 hour of exposures at iso 800 for 180sec. Overcooked the vibrance, but hey, im excited From the ever polluted skies of Birmingham, UK. Skywatcher 72ed Canon 450d Guiding with zwo mini guider + 120mm mini Skywatcher HEQ5 pro SkyTech CLS Canon EOS Clip Fit Filter 15 darks, 80 bias, 80 flats Leaving a tiff here with just light pollution removed and bg calibration if anybody wants to play glory_be.tiff
  5. Hi @freiform sorry for late reply on this. I really can’t help with those questions. I’m stuck in limbo on this myself. Torn between the 183 and 1600 monos for me I think the 183 makes more sense. But, really need to invest in reading more about them! Best of luck
  6. The star travel 120? As far as I can see it’s not a doublet and doesn’t have the coatings on the glass of the 72ed. The 72ed comes with a lovely travel case. Additionally the st120 comes with eyepieces / diaganols. But the biggest difference beyond that is that the 72ed has a much better focuser on it. that being said I think people do image with it, it just depends on what you want. I personally would go with the 72ed for the glass and focuser, but if you wanted to get rid of the 200pds and have a single rig, maybe the quality of glass could be lessened in favour of that setup. if you had the money then you could just get the 120ed ds-Pro and get the best of both
  7. Hmm you know I have never used it for visual - I have a 150p for that. You would (I assume, I’ve never had a refractor for visual) also need a diagonal for visual, but then I believe you wouldn’t require the 2 inch nosepiece for focus as you would have the EP.. but, all roads lead back to Rome and you would need all the other stuff for AP. I think the main reasons that this scope is recommended for imaging is that at 72mm and 420mm it’s very forgiving, with a lovely wide field with a dslr. So it’s great to get started with. Another reason is that it’s a nice price point, and the 3rd reason being it’s a great scope to grab and go. I for instance keep mine fully built upstairs and just carry it down in its entirety when we get a clear night!
  8. Hey Simon, I have a 72ed on my heq5. I use the following combo. 72ed -> OVL field flattened and a canon t-ring adapter. Works great for me. Pic included! my understanding is that you can swap the OVL for a 2 inch nosepiece to achieve focus but I wanted the flattener anyway so it was the logical choice for me 😊
  9. Welcome! I spent too long running around Dartmoor to ever return for a camping trip - but I imagine the sky’s would be lovely. Whenever I was there I was very wet and scratched from crawling through gorse bushes 😂
  10. Sorry taff just saw your reply above! The bolt is just an m10 x however long you want it (M10x114) etc if you wanted to just get a longer one
  11. Hey @Taff there think you have 5e exact same problem I had with my heq5. I wrote about it: https://astrobits.co.uk/blog/skywatcher-heq5-pro-latitude-adjustment/
  12. Hey, I was reading this paper and am becoming a little bit obsessed with the idea of slowly building my own system to do this. https://conference.sdo.esoc.esa.int/proceedings/neosst1/paper/438/NEOSST1-paper438.pdf Im a software engineer so I am confident I could reproduce (or at least have fun with) the code, but am wondering about the hardware side of things. If I got (and i'm formulating this idea as I type) 5 * ZWO ASI 120MM Mini cameras, what kind of lenses would I need to get the all sky coverage required? Not trying to do real science here, just have fun (I like data) Much obliged as always!
  13. @vlaiv - following on from our discussion a while back about a galaxy hunter for a HEQ5 with a 1600mm - is this in contention for that? or is it too slow? thanks in advance as always
  14. I have the neweer tripod - it’s fairly good! I’ve definitely overloaded it now though. I was just using this setup temporarily but I found that it wasn’t particularly stable - ended up going all out on a heq5 as well but I got it out (the SA) last night to get some shots of Jupiter and it serves its purpose well 😊 Was very nice carrying the whole setup in one hand and have everything running off of batteries!
  15. Looking fantastic! Do you fancy nipping over to Solihull and building one again in my back garden?
  16. Thank you so much for sharing - looks like it will meet my expectations perfectly!
  17. Did anybody manage to get some images with this yet? I’m so tempted to buy one!!!!
  18. Id say no, but only because you can find better camera's then that with a bit of persistence for the same price - have you looked on facebook marketplace for instance? There are some very cheap camera's on there - I put in a 60km search around Cardiff (no idea where you are in South Wales!) and lots came up Also you could put an advert in the wanted section of the classifieds on this forum too
  19. I can vouch for the 450d - its nice and cheap on ebay I got mine just to wet my feet in this hobby. Its a great cam and the only thing I would really comment about it is that it has no flip out screen (not a big deal but when starting I found myself struggling to find focus on the cheap lenses i had which meant very careful adjustment in often awkward neck positions!) the other thing it doesnt have is a video crop mode as the 550d does, which whilst ok for lunar (in my experience) is basically a requirement for planetry. So, to sum up - flip out screen + video if you can find a bargain! (cash converters is quite a good place to pick up those 2 models - as is ebay if in uk!)
  20. Thanks! - I'll get onto that tonight Learning all of the many tricks in photoshop I think is the biggest struggle of all of this. I also have a bunch of longer exposures which I might stack onto there tonight and see if that yields some different results!
  21. Brand new here, so this is the first DSO that I took on purpose, 4 days ago. Andromeda Galaxy from my super light polluted back garden near Birmingham, UK. Canon 450D Canon 18-55mm stock lens. Amazon basics tripod! 100 x lights @ 8 seconds - 55mm - ISO 800 20 x Darks 20 x Flats 20 x Bias
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.