Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Spaced Out

Members
  • Posts

    752
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Spaced Out

  1. Looks great. I'd like to do this but I know nothing about 3D printing. If I just give that file to someone who has a 3D printer can they produce it for me and will it be scaled correctly ? Thanks
  2. Agreed ! I use it with CDC and APT too, it's excellent. 👍
  3. Is that a home made or shop bought dew shield ? Looks tidy ! I'm using a DIY flocked camping mat at the moment. I just bought an astrozap shield for my 200 PDS, it fits well and seems solid and well made, I'd like something similar for the 130 PDS if I could find it.
  4. +1.... I agree, the MPCC works well for me too. Mine needed a little bit of initial setting up (just a few test shots) to get the correct spacing but that was easy enough to do.
  5. Yeah I had some minor 'pacman' stars before I cut down the focuser tube.
  6. If you've got a mount capable of astrophotography with a 200p and you're used to using newts (collimation etc) then the 130 PDS seems a reasonable choice. Coma corrector will be required too for decent stars right to the edge, of course a CC could always come later tho. I liked my 130 PDS so much I bought two in the end ! I had an ST-80 as a guidescope but I didn't really rate it for photography. I have no experience of the ST-102.
  7. I guess you have a few options but the SW and Baader seem the most popular, I think the SW one is a focal reducer too ? I use EFW and OAG and it defo needs spacing, I think I used about 1.5mm of delrin spacers alongside one of the standard ZWO (big) spacers that came with the camera. I can DM you some better pics and measurements tomorrow if you still need info.
  8. I have just started using a ZWO ASI 1600 with the 130 PDS. It's my first ever mono astro camera so I have lots to learn. I had a few issues with weight/tilt to start with, but I've identified the problem and have ironed things out a bit. Attached are a couple of images that were just part on my testing things out (just a few subs). Looking forward to getting some clear skies to use the ASI 1600 properly now !
  9. +1 for 130 PDS, I've used mine with a 600d and the 650mm FL works just fine with the crop sensor for many targets.
  10. I've been using that already and looking for smaller FOVs, trouble is it isn't all about FOV is it, gets a bit more complicated than that. I would be looking for cooled for sure. Thanks again👍
  11. Yeah Juan did a good job on my 600D a couple of years ago. Very happy. More recently I used Andy at Astronomiser to modify my 6D. I did this because he was the only person I could find in the UK that would touch a 6D. That turned out good too. http://www.astronomiser.co.uk/
  12. Thanks all for your replies, I might look into a 2nd hand asi 174mm. My budget is £0 at the moment but I am just planning ahead for future savings !
  13. I had to upgrade my bolts when I bought a 2nd hand HEQ5, the stock ones were bent and difficult to adjust (very stiff), I had quite a job getting one of them out. Maybe it is worth carefully removing the bolts to check they are definitely not bent ? The bolt upgrade was a good move for me, it solved my stiff adjustment problems, but one of the stock bolts did look a bit like a banana when I got it out !
  14. +1 for ball head, I got a cheap one for my SAM recently and it works great. https://smile.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B073CW2JMZ/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o09_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
  15. I’m lucky to live on the edge of a fairly quiet village with no big towns nearby. I often leave my gear for an hour or two in our back garden. Having said that the garden is well fenced with a double locked gate and the shed where I run stuff from is locked and alarmed when I’m not in there, so I have thought about security. I feel quite secure in this location but why take any chances !
  16. Thanks mate. Yep small FOV and high resolution is what I was after I guess for galaxies with my 1000mm ? I wasn’t quite sure if the 178-cool would be suitable or not. Can’t honestly say I understand much about pixels and image scale etc ! Any other suggestions for suitable cameras to investigate ?
  17. Hi All I’ve been thinking about a cooled camera for imaging galaxies with my Skywatcher 200 PDS (and maybe the 130 PDS). I thought that the ZWO ASI 178mm-cool might fit the bill, not sure if that would be a good choice but looks like they’re discontinued anyway. I was just wondering if there is a newer camera with similar or better specs now available ? Thanks
  18. No rights or wrongs here and I don’t think it really matters tbh. Personally I just see it as one less link in the chain to go wrong, less equipment to rely on and also you get to keep your handset in good nick. I prefer just to have a single direct cable between PC and mount, less clutter !
  19. I use cartes du ciel and eqmod to control my HEQ5, it works great and takes the handset out of the equation. For this approach you need an EQMOD cable that connects your PC directly to the mount. https://www.firstlightoptics.com/blog/eqmod-controlling-the-heq5-neq6-and-other-mounts-directly-from-a-pc.html
  20. When I first started I didn't understand any of it but I followed a few youtube tutorials to get me up and running. This one was the simplest and most helpful for me in the early days.
  21. Thanks. I hope to connect mine via a powered USB hub to my laptop. 👍
  22. Hi Adam YES, this is exactly the problem and I had the same experience with diagnosing the problem. The motor slips on the spindle, the spindle doesn't slip. Frustratingly if I tension the actual focuser anything above lightly (to hold the weight of the camera/EFW etc) the motor then slips on the spindle and it becomes useless. I've ordered the ZWO EAF so I hope this can be tightened directly to the shaft via a couple of grub screws and drive the now well tensioned focuser without slipping.
  23. Thanks for the help with this, I've ordered one today. 👍
  24. Thanks everyone, this is all good information for a mono newbie like me ! I saw that most folk use the same sub lengths for their RGB so I sort of assumed that was normal practice. I was trying to understand the processes involved and work out my own sweet spot for camera settings/exposure times, I felt I had to ask this question when I found differing ADU values (I was expecting them to be closer), I wasn’t sure how important the difference in values were. Anyway, I’m just feeling my way around and trying to get my gear working. I am at the point now where things are not bad (after a headache with a wobbly focuser tube), I think I have some reasonable settings, I can start imaging. I took my first ever RGB frames on Thursday night and I combined them today, this is the result. It was purely a test to see if I could learn the process, not really a target for me as such it was just available at the time. This is 10 frames each of RGB with no calibration frames. OK, it’s not going to win any awards but I am just chuffed I’ve got a colour image out of a mono camera. Time to do some well planned imaging session now ! Thanks all for your help.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.