Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

johninderby

Beyond the Event Horizon
  • Posts

    15,408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    78

Posts posted by johninderby

  1. 25 minutes ago, Louis D said:

    I've had good luck putting Sorbothane pads under each foot of my aluminum tripods to dampen settling time from 3 to 5 seconds to 1/2 second.  Perhaps wood might improve on that, but it's good enough for me.  I find non-adjustable tripods really annoying for astro observing.  You can't vary the leg spread, you can't increase or decrease the mount height, etc.  That's why I went with heavy duty photo tripods with high load capacities.

    Do yourself a favour and try a Berlebach tripod and it will change your perception of what is a good tripod is. They really are that good. 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

    • Like 1
  2. The Berlebach tripod is more stable and handles vibration better than a steel tripod. Once you’ve used a good wooden tripod you won’t settle for steel. Wood is simply better for telescope tripods.

    Notice how many owners of higher end scopes use a wooden tripod.

  3. Agree with the above recomendations. The EQ5 would be limited to visual only. The EQ6 is much better suited and with the Rowan belt mod will work very well.

    Would go with the William Optics diagonal. You won’t be able to detect any performance difference between the WO and the Televue.

    For a tripod go with the Berlebach wooden tripod. .

    https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/language/en/info/p1210_Berlebach-tripod-UNI-28---100-163-cm--up-to-50-kg--optional-spread-stopper.html

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.