Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Pier - H beam/iron?


tooth_dr

Recommended Posts

On 24/10/2023 at 06:18, 900SL said:

I'm a structural engineer. What height pier and mount type/load?

Regardless of the type and cross section of the pier, it seems we all then use three M10 / M12 bolts or threaded rod with washers and nuts to secure a plate carrying the mount.  Doesn't this make the the thickness or design of the pier less important, especially as that second plate is often placed high enough to allow the fitting of the central bolt to secure the mount to it.  Granted the options are limited, either using a hole cut out of a length of pipe or box section or two plates, but I sometimes feel the size of bolt is often overlooked and the choice of bolt and its length makes the over engineered base a bit pointless?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, malc-c said:

Regardless of the type and cross section of the pier, it seems we all then use three M10 / M12 bolts or threaded rod with washers and nuts to secure a plate carrying the mount.  Doesn't this make the the thickness or design of the pier less important, especially as that second plate is often placed high enough to allow the fitting of the central bolt to secure the mount to it.  Granted the options are limited, either using a hole cut out of a length of pipe or box section or two plates, but I sometimes feel the size of bolt is often overlooked and the choice of bolt and its length makes the over engineered base a bit pointless?

I ran the numbers on this very issue over on CN

This analysis assumed 4 bolts, M16, 150mm between plates, 10 kg lateral load

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/610052-for-those-using-rat-cage-design-for-those-selling-them-got-vibrations/?p=12694158

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 900SL said:

I ran the numbers on this very issue over on CN

This analysis assumed 4 bolts, M16, 150mm between plates, 10 kg lateral load

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/610052-for-those-using-rat-cage-design-for-those-selling-them-got-vibrations/?p=12694158

I went for M16 bolts but 3 of them, as you day, 4 is difficult to level without warping the base. Also using a round brake disc and have left only enough room underneath to get a ratchet wrench in to tighten up the mount.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

Was there a specific disc you used David? Is there any chance of a photo of the underside?

I think it was for a Golf. I searched for one that had a centre bore just large enough for the bottom of my AZEQ6 to fit into. What mount did you say you were going to use? I can send you the spare disc if you want it. I owe you a favour after all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, david_taurus83 said:

I went for M16 bolts but 3 of them, as you day, 4 is difficult to level without warping the base. Also using a round brake disc and have left only enough room underneath to get a ratchet wrench in to tighten up the mount.

Cantilever deflection is a function of height cubed, so keeping the bolts short greatly reduces deflection 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:

I think it was for a Golf. I searched for one that had a centre bore just large enough for the bottom of my AZEQ6 to fit into. What mount did you say you were going to use? I can send you the spare disc if you want it. I owe you a favour after all.

I bought a used NEQ6. I’ve dug out the welder here, see what I can come up with 😬 appreciate the offer and might still avail of it.  Cheaper than buying a lathe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@tooth_dr Here's some pics. The PCD pattern on the flange on my pier isnt divisible by 3 so the 3 bolts are unequally spaced but its not an issue. I just made a template over the flange and put onto the disc and marked the centres before drilling. The bore of the disc is 65mm which is perfect for the AZEQ6. Not sure if the NEQ6 is the same. I also had to drill and tap for the North peg. An M12 bolt underneath then with a metal plate to bridge the recess in the disc holds it all down.

 

20231029_110220.jpg

20231029_110231.jpg

20231029_110702.jpg

20231029_111023.jpg

20231029_111526.jpg

20231029_111537.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, david_taurus83 said:

@tooth_dr Here's some pics. The PCD pattern on the flange on my pier isnt divisible by 3 so the 3 bolts are unequally spaced but its not an issue. I just made a template over the flange and put onto the disc and marked the centres before drilling. The bore of the disc is 65mm which is perfect for the AZEQ6. Not sure if the NEQ6 is the same. I also had to drill and tap for the North peg. An M12 bolt underneath then with a metal plate to bridge the recess in the disc holds it all down.

 

20231029_110220.jpg

20231029_110231.jpg

20231029_110702.jpg

20231029_111023.jpg

20231029_111526.jpg

20231029_111537.jpg

Hi David. That’s very helpful. A small piece of rectangular bar, that’s what I couldn’t think of, but can see how its obvious now for holding the eq6 onto the disc. Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, tooth_dr said:

Hi David. That’s very helpful. A small piece of rectangular bar, that’s what I couldn’t think of, but can see how its obvious now for holding the eq6 onto the disc. Thank you!

No problem. Like I said, if you want the spare disc your welcome to it. I can even drill it for you if you can let me know the bolt pattern on your pier.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just wanted to continue the updates here.

I was gifted the DN pipe so beggars can’t be choosers!  The DN100 was a 2m length so too long.  I established the required length for my observatory - 1.06m - then cut the flange off one end and shortened the pipe accordingly.

Plan is to weld it up tonight.

 

 

IMG_7235.jpeg

IMG_7236.jpeg

IMG_7237.jpeg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mandy D said:

I can't understand why you didn't cut the flange off at the weld, then put the shorter pipe into the flange like the original. It would have been much easier and a lot stronger than attempting a butt joint.

There are a couple of reasons why that didn’t happen 😊 but I don’t really feel like explaining myself.   I’m happy with my work but thanks for your feedback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice job. Single V butt weld with 1mm root gap would work 😀 

Assuming the weld got a couple of mm penetration into the gap then you should be good, the mount doesn't impose much load on the joint, certainly nowhere near the weld capacity. Just check for any cracks, lamellar tears or fusion defects

 

Edited by 900SL
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.