Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Is this good enough


Recommended Posts

That is close but not quite perfect. It probably won't make much difference.

Why would you not get it spot on? Is it very difficult because the focus is coarse/ stiff?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fine focus is very imperceptible at times, more so with camera lenses, it's like you have to rotate a touch but having done it you feel you haven't rotated at all but it's visible in the star shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes good enough is exactly that.

There will be other occasions when it just drops into place and you get 'spot on'.

I found I wasted a lot of time over the years in a number of hobbles trying to get 'spot on' when good enough would have done the job.

That said, sometimes only 'spot on' will do.

I think I am beginning to spiral out of control 🤪😁

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/08/2023 at 15:12, shropshire lad said:

Sigma lens

So focusing with the mask will leave you with coloured halos around bright stars. Use it to get you close, then lose it.

Now, using zoomed in live view on the same star, adjust in tiny amounts until the blue [1] halo just disappears.

Cheers and HTH 

[1] not familiar with the 600 so the residual halo may be red; same idea.

Edited by alacant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My (limited) experience with camera lenses says that you need a micro-focus to avoid going mad. Mechanical ones are available from Telescope Service. Alacant's point above makes sense, though.

Just putting an improvised lever on a lens or focuser can also help with micro-adjustment.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alacant said:

So focusing with the mask will leave you with coloured halos around bright stars. Use it to get you close, then lose it.

Now, using zoomed in live view on the same star, adjust in tiny amounts until the blue [1] halo just disappears.

Cheers and HTH 

[1] not familiar with the 600 so the residual halo may be red; same idea.

Sorry dont fully understand your answer, If I lose the mask then I will lose the coloured halo's wont I .... 

Also the Sigma lens is the 150-600mm f5-6.3 C lens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

My (limited) experience with camera lenses says that you need a micro-focus to avoid going mad. Mechanical ones are available from Telescope Service. Alacant's point above makes sense, though.

Just putting an improvised lever on a lens or focuser can also help with micro-adjustment.

Olly

How do you mean an improvised lever ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shropshire lad said:

How do you mean an improvised lever ?

 

Well, all you need is a lever attached to the focus ring, sticking out from it like a bicycle spoke, if you like. If the focus ring is the O the lever would stick out like this:  O----   The long lever lets you make smaller adustments.

Olly

Edited by ollypenrice
False click
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, shropshire lad said:

Sorry excuse my ignorance .... a lever on what and how.

 

image.png.a27408ebd715e6f64532a35ed276826f.png

Further you are from the axis of rotation - smaller angle for the same linear motion. So you can make fine adjustments with lever much more easily.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shropshire lad said:

Sorry excuse my ignorance .... a lever on what and how.

 

Here's a link to a lever with push-pull micro asjusters. I had one. It's not bad.

https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/language/en/info/p3286_TS-Optics-Microfocuser-for-your-camera-lens-up-to-135-mm-Diameter.html

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, vlaiv said:

image.png.a27408ebd715e6f64532a35ed276826f.png

Further you are from the axis of rotation - smaller angle for the same linear motion. So you can make fine adjustments with lever much more easily.

You even matched my red in your image, Vlad! Pure genius, as ever!!

:grin:lly

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ollypenrice said:

I have one you can have foc .PM me if your interested. Regards Andrew 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vlaiv said:

And that was before I even saw that you edited your post :D

:grin:  It's not remarkable if you don't believe in the tensed theory of time (past, moving present, future.) And who could belive in a theory as naive as that one???

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

:grin:  It's not remarkable if you don't believe in the tensed theory of time (past, moving present, future.) And who could belive in a theory as naive as that one???

Olly

And just like that (phrase that sounds familiar for some reason?) we jumped from focusing to this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-theory_of_time

:D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, vlaiv said:

And just like that (phrase that sounds familiar for some reason?) we jumped from focusing to this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-theory_of_time

:D

 

Homework!  That's tomorrow taken care of, then. Oh no, wait,, I don't yet know if I'm a B-theorist or not so tomorrow may be an illusion...

:grin:lly

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lever is a very common thing in videography for focus pulling. From my use with all sorts of lenses both old and modern it's not really necessary though for star focussing, you can always reduce slight star bloat post process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Elp said:

The lever is a very common thing in videography for focus pulling. From my use with all sorts of lenses both old and modern it's not really necessary though for star focussing, you can always reduce slight star bloat post process.

Thank you Elp, what software do you use for this?

Paul

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS or GIMP, many people apply a star reduction to their images to give more emphasis on the target.

When using a camera body I usually take a few images and zoom right in so you can judge the focus better. Some bodies also have focus assist where you can zoom in live and adjust focus, but I find you cant zoom is as much as zooming on the captured images.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.