Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Excellent holder & microfocuser for Samyang 135


Recommended Posts

I recently solved a lot of problems by buying a 3D-printed holder with microfocusing ring from a small French company: http://www.astrokraken.fr/bracket-system-for-samyang-rokinon-135-f-2-telephoto-lens-a183920490 ( I have no connection with the company - I just googled for Samyang/Rokinon holders and found it). The ZWO camera-holder I used previously gave me tilt issues.

I have now used it a couple of nights and it is really solid and easy to use for focusing. I use the Samyang as a piggy-back scope on my dual RASA8 rig and even if I attach it all with a SW piggy-back holder I found no flex-issues as far as I can tell. Here is a link for that SW holder:

https://www.astroshop.eu/guidescope-mounts/skywatcher-guide-scope-mount/p,20120

 

Cheers, Göran

Here is an image of Sh2-140 I took the other night.

 

20221012_103723_resized.jpg

20221012_103746_resized.jpg

20221012_103802_resized.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a nicely engineered set up and the proof is how it performs in the field. I have found sag to be a big issue when trying to hang a sizeable camera from the lens, some form of camera body support is essential.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tomato said:

Looks like a nicely engineered set up and the proof is how it performs in the field. I have found sag to be a big issue when trying to hang a sizeable camera from the lens, some form of camera body support is essential.

I used to gave a sag problem, but at about the same time as I bought the holder I also bought ZWOs EOS adapter with filter slider and that may have helped. My previous adapter was not sturdy enough.

https://www.teleskop-express.de/shop/product_info.php/info/p12422

So committed the scientific sin of changing two parameters at the same time🥴. In any case I see not sag in the setup now, only a bit of coma around the edge but that could be because the NBZ filter shifts the back-focus and the distance in no longer perfect. Maybe I should add a thin distance ring. I will see how it goes when I use it without a filter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used this for a while but it ended up snapping which was disappointing. I ended up buying the autofocus kit from Astrodymium (spelling?) and now use a ZWO EAF with it. Seems a little better made than the astrokraken one I bought, but yours looks a little different to mine so perhaps they've updated/upgraded it slightly? It worked well for a while though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Phillyo said:

I used this for a while but it ended up snapping which was disappointing. I ended up buying the autofocus kit from Astrodymium (spelling?) and now use a ZWO EAF with it. Seems a little better made than the astrokraken one I bought, but yours looks a little different to mine so perhaps they've updated/upgraded it slightly? It worked well for a while though!

Interesting, do you mean that the plastic broke? Hopefully he has improved it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.