Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

First go at the Rosette Nebula


StuartT

Recommended Posts

Reasonably happy with this for only one hour of data. It's clearly a v bright target.

Esprit 150 ED APO (with 0.77x reducer), ASI2600MC Pro, Optolong L-Extreme.

1.5 arcsec/px

 

Rosette_Nebula_L_Extreme_-St AFP.jpg

Edited by StuartT
  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, StuartT said:

Reasonably happy with this for only one hour of data. It's clearly a v bright target.

Esprit 150 ED APO (with 0.77x reducer), ASI2600MC Pro, Optolong L-Extreme

 

Rosette_Nebula_L_Extreme_-St AFP.jpg

Superb image, and only one hour, I posted an image of this target a couple of days ago with just 1 hour with the same filter and camera…well mine is the QHY version….👍🏼 BTW what sub lengths did you use…??

this was mine 

 

Edited by Stuart1971
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Stuart1971 said:

Superb image, and only one hour, I posted an image of this target a couple of days ago with just 1 hour with the same filter and camera…well mine is the QHY version….👍🏼 BTW what sub lengths did you use…??

this was mine 

 

Thank you. I never use exposures longer than 35 sec (as I have never ventured into guiding). With a camera as good as the 2600 and a target as bright as this, I’m not sure there is any need for longer exposures, frankly. But I’m happy to be persuaded otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StuartT said:

Thank you. I never use exposures longer than 35 sec (as I have never ventured into guiding). With a camera as good as the 2600 and a target as bright as this, I’m not sure there is any need for longer exposures, frankly. But I’m happy to be persuaded otherwise.

I used 2 min subs in mine with the L-Extreme, as you need to swamp any read noise, so a decent amount of signal is always good…👍🏼

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, StuartT said:

Honestly, Pixinsight is a real revelation! Now I understand what all the fuss is about!

I love PI as well, I think if you get the way it works as it is very different to most other photo processing software then it is not the massive learning curve some seem to think it is.
Of course there are so many processes and scripts that you are not going to master it all over a weekend but many of them are not required to get good images. 

Steve

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.