Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

grab and go tabletop for planets


Recommended Posts

Interested to know  what folks think of the Orion StarMax 90mm table top Mak for grab and go planet and lunar observing?  With the large planets in fairly good  position for now it would be nice to have  a quick set  up option on nights  I just don't feel like dragging  out  my 10 " Dob (although I do like it very much )   Looking for something very light weight so this fits the bill in that regard. What  about  cool down time for this scope?   Any thoughts, personal experience with this?  Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have a budget in mind?

The most grab and go setup in terms of being ready to use ASAP with little cool down time would be a small refractor. A Mak should be good for the Moon and planets and is a really compact solution, but they're not the quickest to acclimatise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried a 90mm Mak, but found the views just too dim and low resolution to be fulfilling.  Jumping up slightly to a 127mm Mak improved matters considerably without going overboard on weight and size.

I would agree with others in this thread that a 130 or 150 Heritage would probably work well for your needs.  Neither will be perfect, but what telescope is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a 105mm ETX which was a great lunar scope, and wonderful for quick views - and actually cooldown was pretty rapid too. But you’re not going to see satisfying detail beyond the two main rings on Jupiter for example. The current generation of larger table top Dobsonians look like a much more tempting proposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/10/2021 at 18:15, Highburymark said:

I had a 105mm ETX which was a great lunar scope, and wonderful for quick views - and actually cooldown was pretty rapid too. But you’re not going to see satisfying detail beyond the two main rings on Jupiter for example. The current generation of larger table top Dobsonians look like a much more tempting proposition.

That sounds like a lot less detail than you'd see through a decent 3" refractor. Is the 105mm ETX really that bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Andrew_B said:

That sounds like a lot less detail than you'd see through a decent 3" refractor. Is the 105mm ETX really that bad?

Was commenting on limitations of 90mm against bigger tabletop options. I love small Maks - but there is a limit to how much detail you can see with 90mms. Under good conditions, the 105 was able to reveal the GRS on Jupiter and Cassini on Saturn, and it was capable of incredibly sharp lunar views - just as good as an expensive apo. But under average seeing, it was difficult to resolve much beyond the main features of the planets. Considering the OP also has a 10” dob, a 90mm Mak might ultimately prove unsatisfying.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.