Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

My Speers WALER thread


Ags

Recommended Posts

Speers WALER Series 2 4.9 mm with 1.6x extension tube fitted.

20210715_221400.thumb.jpg.9fd0e403585c55c47eb4fdcc6b863e52.jpg

These are big eyepieces but not as heavy as they look, as the design involves a huge air space between the lenses in the nosepiece and the lenses at the eye end. They are out of production now but have always been highly regarded as so-called "Nagler killers".

I have had a Series 1 10 mm for over a decade, picked up cheap because the eyepiece had developed an incurable lens rattle - a common problem with Speers WALERS. But I have never noticed any effect on the deep sky views which are always superb, certainly at least as good as the Explore Scientific widefields I have owned. For planetary viewing the eyepiece is very effective but does fall a little short, with faint ghosting around bright objects.

I have now acquired two Series 2 units (4.9 and 13.4 mm) and will update the thread with first light hopefully tomorrow. I only checked that I could reach focus so far. Although they are supposedly long eye relief eyepieces (WALER = Wide Angle Long Eye Relief),  I can confirm eye relief on all of them is positively eyelash tickling!

SpeerWALER.thumb.jpg.af741fa95e7592732bcd70a31f8accbb.jpg

Edited by Ags
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't tell me that! 😀 My astro budget is eaten up for months... I do try to get eyepieces second hand though, the only new eyepieces in my case are a couple of plossls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had first light with the 4.9 and 13.4 with my Zs66. Happy with both, the tight eye relief I saw during the day disappears at night. Very comfortable to use and easy to hold the view. Based on my experiences of a solar session earlier in the day, and from trying to split some tight doubles, the 1.6 extension ring does not maintain the quality of the view.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That one is new to me,  looks like a great 2" eyepiece for a Mak or SCT (1.9 degrees in my C6...). If I am ever in the market for 2" eyepieces I will keep an eye out for one of these 😃

14 hours ago, LDW1 said:

My 2" 31.5mm, 90°, pin point edge to edge in my various refractors f6-f11.4, a great eyepiece for $150 C

8319A517-CC7C-480E-9E94-F6F1BA4D8E35.jpeg

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a brief session viewing the top ⅔ of the Moon (the remainder was below the garden wall) and was using the 4.9 mm for 80x magnification at f5.9. The view was nice and sharp (and comfortable), but the eyepiece does have a lot of lateral color.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Issue only shows up in the outer quarter so it detracts from the whole-Moon view, but not from examining any particular part.

In general no major complaints with the eyepieces so far; comfy, give great views, and as cheap (second hand) as a good Plossl. Only the edge of the Moon in the outer field shows up the lateral color.

Edited by Ags
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/07/2021 at 07:19, Ags said:

Had a brief session viewing the top ⅔ of the Moon (the remainder was below the garden wall) and was using the 4.9 mm for 80x magnification at f5.9. The view was nice and sharp (and comfortable), but the eyepiece does have a lot of lateral color.

With the Moon that low in the sky, I'm surprised you could differentiate chromatic aberration in the eyepiece from atmospheric refraction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try repeating the lateral color test with a highly elevated, bright star to gauge just how much there is.  My 13mm AstroTech AF70 has the most LC of any mainstream eyepiece I own.  It throws up a very pretty rainbow starting at 70% out from center.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wanted to spend some time with the new eyepieces before subjecting them to a more nitpicking analysis so that I could form a general opinion of them before finding faults.

So far I love the SW13.4, but my general impression of the SW4.9 is that the image sometimes feels a bit soft.

Tonight I approached the eyepieces more forensically using a Zenithstar 66 to test them and using Deneb as a test star.

Starting with the ES 6.7 mm and Speers WALER 10 mm I have had for years: these are both on a par with SW10 slightly edging it. There is a slight degree of false color at the edge of the field as well as astigmatism (a star focuses to a radial line inside focus and a tangential line outside focus, and is a cross at focus). The ES6.7 has less astigmatism, but very strong false color at the edge.

The SW13.4 is very similar to the SW10, perhaps slightly better,  showing less lateral color. The main difference is the wider true field of the SW13.4 shows more of the field curvature of the Zenithstar 66.

The SW4.9 is another matter. Lateral color is much stronger (perhaps because of the greater magnification) but the edge is simply not sharp. While the other SWs focus stars at the edge to a sharp line/cross, the SW4.9 never gets sharper than a blur.

Of course, this only covers performance off-axis and you have to look for these defects to find them. The SW4.9 is a bit of an exception, as the full solar or lunar disk fills the eyepiece, so I do find myself looking off-axis more with the SW4.9 than the others.

On axis, all the eyepieces perform faultlessly, like any other modern eyepiece that hasn't been hit with a hammer.

Edited by Ags
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've got the 5-8mm series 1 zoom and I love it. I have worried for years about the gap in the side though and bits and dust getting in but it hasn't seemed to ever be a problem :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.