Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Rough rotating rings scratching my telescope.


Recommended Posts

Hi, I have this minor issue about my rotating ring, one of the 2 is damaging the paint of my telescope over time has the pictures bellow and I wish to find a way to mitigate that problem. I thought about replacing the textile by something else a bit thicker and softer (If i can find anything).. Do you think it can be worth the effort and what should I use if you already had a success story with a specific type of textile.

U23MZiI.jpg?1

eIitNdI.jpg?1

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pads shouldn't scratch the paintwork, so can you identify anything which is protruding through? A rough bit of casting or overlong bolt? If you can find exactly what is causing it perhaps you can deal with it with a file or an extra washer etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Stu and @SkyGibbon

I found some adhesive felt at a local store. I bought a few thickness but the one with the adhesive must be almost 3x the thickness of the original black one from Skywatcher. I am proceeding to the upgrade right now and frankly it will be a superior job I think. They had like 50 different colors too.

-- > I am pimping my telescope with cool red color accessories. :icon_biggrin:

QLTuHse.jpg?1

CkHfDlk.jpg?1

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a similar problem when my 150PDS was new. I frequently rotated it in its rings, and this caused serious scratches in the paint work. It turned out that the rings had burrs left after machining. After removing these and gentle sanding of the inside of the rings, the problem was solved. No need to add any extra felt. I assume you've run your fingers along the edges of the rings to make sure these are smooth. Unfortunately, Skywatchers quality control isn't always as it should be ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@wimvb  yes i touched the whole thing all around and i could not see a thing, no burrs. I removed most metal particles almost 2 years ago but more damage occurred anyway, probably smaller particles I can't see, the painted ring itself is quite soft all around. I think the new felt will be much better with particles with a better thickness, I also know it has no metal particles in it...

I am testing that.

I found that putting the rings inside the freezer will greatly help to remove the original strips of felt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok my project is finished, took some time but I am really proud of the result and there is a notable difference in the rotation fluidity, it's much smoother. The increased thickness has no apparent negative effect.

Final result

Rmlj7WA.jpg

SO69BWv.jpg

Previous thickness

Y5A5qHy.jpg?1

New thickness (The red one is more then twice of the original)

tRhzPP2.jpg

Difference with the original vs the new.

QD0d5RL.jpg

I think it's going to work.. and hopefully if it can help others prevent their tube from being scratched.. The sockets and screws were cleaned too with oil and Q-tips to make sure they don't contain anymore metal scrap from the tapping process.. I am pretty sure that was the initial problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried the new rings and it's much much better then before. I don't need to tighten the thumb screws like 15 times to seize the telescope like I use to, now it's 5 6 times max. much faster. The telescope will roll in the rings with better fluidity too.

It's a top upgrade, it tried it for 3 hours and it's has good has it can be considering the tube is not completely round.

I encourage people to replace the original felt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/02/2018 at 20:45, N3ptune said:

The felt installed inside the ring is very thin too, I don't know why they didn't put anything with more thickness.

Cost, pure and simple. The paint is very thin, the felt is cheap and thin. 

Siywatcher scopes are great value for money, but the corners have to be cut to get the price down.

Thankfully, the optics are usually where the money goes, and are normally very good. 

That's why an equinox refractor costs much more than a DS pro..identical optics, very different hardware quality.

It's also why budled accessories tend to be low rent on the cheaper scopes: nothing is for nothing?.

You've done a great job on your re-felting!:thumbsup::thumbsup:!

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@F15Rules

Cost, pure and simple. The paint is very thin, the felt is cheap and thin. 

Siywatcher scopes are great value for money, but the corners have to be cut to get the price down.

I noticed that, the tube itself is far from a perfectly round too. I would not mind if that tube cost was 100$ more to improve the overall quality starting by having a very round tube, better felt inside the rings, a different paint inside to blacken the interior, something harder and less powdery.  Overall I think it's pretty good scope like you said about the optics and the dual speed crayford focuser is impressive.

--> Only If it was easier to rotate...

I found out disassembling the instrument, while looking at the front plastic ring. If you look carefully at the picture, telescope is oval, thats its biggest flaw by far. Perhaps this can prevent me from getting perfect collimation too (but thats pure speculation speculation)

jcgB4E2.jpg?1

If i had only one suggestion to Skywatcher: Find a way to make the tube rounder so it's easier to rotate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.