Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M109 L from dual imaging setup.


MikeD

Recommended Posts

I hadn't given these data sets a proper process because I thought a faulty monitor switch (causing the monitor to keep switching on and off) had spoiled the subs (see here)

Since the gradient in the 10" newt subs may very well be stray light from the star "phad" in the Ursa major, I decided to process both sets of data I have from my 10" newt and the 80ED.

Both data sets were shot simultaneously over two nights (28th and 29th of April)

the 10" newt shot was 31 @ 600 seconds taken with my SVXF9 and CLS/L filters.

the 80ED shot was 27 @ 600 seconds HX916 and no filters.

and the third is a composite of the two data sets.

Thanks for looking

Mike.

post-730-0-26426700-1367621329_thumb.jpg

post-730-0-53217600-1367621343_thumb.jpg

post-730-0-90679900-1367621352_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.