Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Next ep.


Mr Fiery Jack

Recommended Posts

All Nagler once said we only need 3 eyepieces to cover everything, perhaps 4, he added as a caveat. After a bit of a slim down in EPs', mostly to fund a few modest TeleVues' I have now a vast collection of 3, a 32mm TV plossil and 2 Radians, 14mm and 6mm ones. And so on to the question. Which ep would you buy as Al' Nagler's decadent fourth ep? My scopes are a 10 inch 00 4.8fl Dobsonian and a SW ED100 which I fitted with a Moonlight, a lovely scope I feel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 4 is decadent, what would Al make of the 8 eyepieces I have :undecided:

Personally I'd add something around the 8mm mark to the 3 that you have. That would give you a useful mid-high power option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All Nagler once said we only need 3 eyepieces to cover everything, perhaps 4, he added as a caveat. After a bit of a slim down in EPs', mostly to fund a few modest TeleVues' I have now a vast collection of 3, a 32mm TV plossil and 2 Radians, 14mm and 6mm ones. And so on to the question. Which ep would you buy as Al' Nagler's decadent fourth ep? My scopes are a 10 inch 00 4.8fl Dobsonian and a SW ED100 which I fitted with a Moonlight, a lovely scope I feel.

Obviously he has changed his mind. Nowadays he meant we need 3 eyepiece series to cover everything. Delos, Ethos, and Naglers. Panoptics can be added as a caveat. :D

I think you can use a 31 Nagler for a bit of extra wide field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would go for around the 8mm mark, there may be conditions/situations where your 6mm is not usable when and 8mm is.

Think that you need 4 and that 3 is likely one too few. Caused by the fact that at the high magnification ehd it is quite possible that the highest power one is unusable whereas one a little less on magnification would deliver good views. So 2 at the high mag end, 1 medium and 1 low power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would go for around the 8mm mark, there may be conditions/situations where your 6mm is not usable when and 8mm is.

Think that you need 4 and that 3 is likely one too few. Caused by the fact that at the high magnification ehd it is quite possible that the highest power one is unusable whereas one a little less on magnification would deliver good views. So 2 at the high mag end, 1 medium and 1 low power.

I would say you are probably right, 8mm it is. I can always upgrade the plossl later on perhaps, its stood me in good stead this far though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.