M16

[kookoo_gr]

After many months of solving various bugs at my system (and the lack of free time) imanaged to get a decent image

http://www.astrobin....15256/?mod=none

All comments are welcomed

[sologuitarist61]

Lovely image and good star points, would appreciate some more info on what was used, how many subs etc, etc.

[kookoo_gr]

Photo info http://www.astrobin.com/15256/0/?mod=none (or just click at the view technical card of the first link i posted)

As for the stars i can't take my mind of thinking that i have oversaturated them

[peter shah]

you know an image is worth so much more after sorting out all the bugs........and a this one is beautifully done, very clean nothing forced....top job

[Gina]

That's lovely

[htj]

Very nice detail in the neblua. Stars are round and good color in my untrained eye, but are perhaps a bit saturated as you say. They certainly seem very bright, but stars tend be that :-)

[RAC]

Wow thats a good one. For the price of the gear used it gives olly's a real run for its money!

[farunj]

It's a really wonderful image!!

[vdb]

Very Nice indeed!

It's cool to see that the color balance you show was the one I also got after combination both Olly and I ended up in other color pallets.

Having both equipments I can see that at first there is little difference indeed, but then you notice the bigger FOV, better star shape and it's faster to get deeper.

But one can wonder if it justifies the price difference. (I looked at gendlers M16 in the 0.9 meter RC and had the same feeling )

Yves.

[kookoo_gr]

thanks for the comments, i think i need to reconsdier some steps at my proccesing when deailng with stars