David JM Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 One of a series of images for later processing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gina Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 That looks promising - a number of those stacked should give a good result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollypenrice Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 As Gina says. Is this a single sub? Although bright, M13 will benefit from several hours of data.Olly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quatermass Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 Way to go lots more subs and balance with darks flats and bias shot should really boost it for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David JM Posted May 25, 2012 Author Share Posted May 25, 2012 I'm struggling to process them with Deep Sky Stacker at the moment, various ISOs and exposures.To be honest I'm just glad to have it in focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David JM Posted May 25, 2012 Author Share Posted May 25, 2012 RegiStax to the rescue.Still not very good though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viv Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 Looking at it with my completely untrained eye i'd say you need more time.If you can only get 30 second subs - you're going to need allot ! But then you'll have allot of noise to deal with.This is a single (terrible) sub from my garden, but it's 3 minutes - no editing (except a crop). It's come out very noisy (don't know why) & my focus is slighly out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ags Posted May 25, 2012 Share Posted May 25, 2012 This is a great result from a 4SE - lots of focal length on a middling mount. I am going to try M13 tomorrow night - now Iḿ not sure whether to try my Mak or my ST80.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David JM Posted May 26, 2012 Author Share Posted May 26, 2012 I've processed the stills for each exposure setting in RegiStax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gina Posted May 26, 2012 Share Posted May 26, 2012 Good start Didn't know Registax was suitable for DSOs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David JM Posted May 26, 2012 Author Share Posted May 26, 2012 Good start Didn't know Registax was suitable for DSOs.I don't think it's supposed to be used that way but I can't get DSS to work, even after reading the manual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ags Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 Where does DSS go wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David JM Posted May 27, 2012 Author Share Posted May 27, 2012 DSS is probably fine, I think I'm doing something wrong. I need to consult the two top imagers at R&DAS, but I got this from the same M13 I put into Registax.Like I say, it's going to be user error. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ags Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 DSS is funny about some CR2 formats. In my experience it renders a section of the image if it has to deal with recent CR2 files (such as those produced by the 1100D). Converting the files to TIFF in DPP resolves the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gina Posted May 27, 2012 Share Posted May 27, 2012 You need the latest Beta (forget the number ATM) - the standard version won't work properly with CR2 files from the 1100D. I expect the same applies to all the Digic 4 models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.