Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Synguider or QHY5?


russ.will

Recommended Posts

Having been surprised at how (relatively) successful some of my initial dabbling with the 450D and WO ZS80 has been, I've decided to get a bit more serious at this imaging lark!

Unfortunately, I sold my SW 9x50 finder and as another one isn't much less than an ST80 second hand, I bought one of those for the dual purposes of guiding and maybe a holiday scope.

A Synguider has the obvious attraction of simplicity, but as I'm planning on getting the laptop involved anyway, it seems sensible to at least consider a QHY5, or some such. I'm presuming that it also opens up possibilities for lunar/planetary imaging too?

Just dealing with DSLR imaging for the moment, what do you gain by going for the QHY5, considering that there's not much in the two price wise?

On a related note, I'm planning on going to Astrofest for the first time. Is it worth keeping my powder dry, if there are show 'bargains' to be had?

Cheers,

Russell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the Qhy5 you have the option of using the ST4 port or USB and software such as PHD, so your guiding options are not as limited as using a standalone guider.

The Qhy5 also makes for a good luna / planetary imaging camera as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I always seem to see is people saying that the synguider can work great or it won't work. There also doesn't seem to be much support for the synguider either. If you get the QHY5 you will be able to kill 2 birds with one stone as stated and can use it as both a guide cam and planetary. If you are planning on taking a laptop out anyway it would make sense just to use the QHY5 + PHD as it is a popular setup opposed to a synguider and should be easier to diagnose any problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your going to have a "PC" around then I would definitely go down the QHY5 route its a much more flexible solution...

My synguider is my guider of last resort...and will normally only be used for widefield work... It does work well on a decent guidescope the ST80 is an almost perfect match to its requirement spec.. but the need to center the guidestar on the synguider makes accurate framing of longer fl setups more fiddly...

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As above, don't put all your eggs in one basket with the standalone. With the QHY5 you have a solar system camera and a guide camera which can run in a variety of software packages. If you want to drizzle guide one day then you need the QHY5 type camera.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. This is what I sort of expected to hear, so it's nice to have that confirmed. QHY something, or similar, it is then.

For the £200 (give or take) available, is there any other cameras I should consider? There are 3 QHY5 variants, even before considering other manufacturers. I'm guessing the standard 5 is about the sweet spot, but I'm open to persuasion from the old hands!

Russell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're looking at possibly wanting to do Lunar/Planetary with the camera, then the 5v is probably the best of the three for you. The global shutter is better for imaging with than the rolling shutter of the others. I agree with Olly also, the QHY cam's allow you to dither (move the scopes a little to shift target slightly between frames) easily and that's very worthwhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're looking at possibly wanting to do Lunar/Planetary with the camera, then the 5v is probably the best of the three for you. The global shutter is better for imaging with than the rolling shutter of the others. I agree with Olly also, the QHY cam's allow you to dither (move the scopes a little to shift target slightly between frames) easily and that's very worthwhile.
I'm not so concerned about lunar/planetary - It's more of a happy coincidence that this will be possible, but I take your comment on board.

The dithering issue is not something I've heard of yet, but now I have (and will read up on it), it's nice to know it's catered for.

Russell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, I noticed that whilst Googling the subject. So, that's another thing to remember...I suppose that like most subjects, it starts to make more sense when you're actually doing it, rather than just reading about the theory.

I'll ping MA and see if they're doing any show discounts, or pre-order specials.

Russell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I emailed Bernard and the show offer doesn't extend to much more than getting the ST4 cable for free or, if you prefer, a tenner off.

However, I did get to choose the colour and so mine will be in tarts handbag red.:D

I'd better get reading up before it arrives....

Russell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

need to center the guidestar on the synguider makes accurate framing of longer fl setups more fiddly

My synguider happily auto-locks on stars which are not at the centre. Isn't there also a manual lock option?

It won't guide my HEQ5 mind you, but that is a separate issue!

NigelM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My synguider happily auto-locks on stars which are not at the centre. Isn't there also a manual lock option?

It won't guide my HEQ5 mind you, but that is a separate issue!

NigelM

Interesting.. my confusion coems from this statement in the manual...

Adjust the guide scope to bring the star to the center if it is too close to the edge of the Image zone on the SynGuider. This is only necessary when the ZOOM level Is set at 1 ...

If you use the fact that it doesnt matter wher ethe satr is onthe other zoom levels this would sort of suggest that it possibly needs to be in the centre 128x128 pixel area..

Then again I guess it all depends on what they mean by too close to the edge...

Any idea whats wrong with your HEQ5? It guides Mine fine and my EQ3 Pro now its go the later MC hardware...

Peter...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any idea whats wrong with your HEQ5? It guides Mine fine

Nope - but imaging is worse with the guider on than off, although the synguider itself seems to keep the guide star in the centre of the cross hairs ok. But I end up with double images, trailed images in weird directions (i.e. both RA and Dec) etc etc - you name it, I get it! And that is in 1min exposures. I still have more testing to do ...

NigelM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been reading up on this subject, in preparation for picking up my QHY5 at the weekend, so I count myself as a next-to-know-nothing on the subject, but...

I'm sure I saw a thread (or a blog) where someone was having similar issues and found that his guide camera was fighting with his PEC training profile.

Like I say, I don't know one way or the other, but it has the 'feel' of logical.

Russell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi

I posted your exact question last week, I opted for a qhy5 and am so glad I did!

It's so easy to set up and use and got 5min subs straight away no probs. I use it with a modest notebook running xp and it's fine. I have the same mount as you and they both seem to work flawlessly. It's a no brainer really, I was up and running 5 mins after polar aligning my mount after the normal 3star align.

Go for the qhy5 you will love it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I picked my QHY5 up at Astrofest last weekend, not to mention about £200 worth of other stuff that I hadn't intended...

Anyhoo, I've spent most of the last week getting to know it all indoors and tonight is the first chance I've had to get it all outdoors. Wish me luck!

Russell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.