Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

  • Announcements


Carl M

Advanced Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

43 Excellent


About Carl M

  • Rank
    Star Forming
  • Birthday 12/04/94

Contact Methods

  • MSN

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Ramsey, Cambridge, England
  1. You could be right there, it's very difficult to tell... should have taken an image in the top left without filter and the lines may have been a bit more apparent if they are there. If that would be the case then I'd assume that the diffraction spike is coming from the secondary not being centred and the light cone clipping a bit of the focuser. I did have a single diffraction spike problem before without the filter, perhaps since then I've recentred the secondary and made the problem worse or better which has changed the pattern of the spike. I hadn't thought of that, thank you - time to recollimate!
  2. Hello there, A while ago I posted a topic with the same problem, and initially I thought something was up with collimation or mechanically. Previous thread: However, now I have found the problem to only exist when my Astronomik CLS-CCD filter is installed into my Canon 1000D camera. The only thing I can seem to do that changes the effect of these spikes is move the bright star into corners of the image. When I remove the filter, the issue is no longer present. Obviously I could just image without the filter, but I don't think I will be able to expose for as long without LP saturating the image. Any ideas as to what else could cause this? I'm struggling to think of anything the filter is possibly doing to the light path to cause this artefact, other than possibility of some sort of internal reflection. I've even intentionally made collimation bad to see if the spikes changed shape compared to collimating properly, and nothing changed. It does seem as though something could be intruding the light path, but I can't figure out what it would be and why adding a filter would create the effect? I appreciate any suggestions!
  3. I have a spare set of 235mm Skywatcher Tube Rings that came with my 8" Quattro. I already had a pair of rings with a guidescope on so these were swapped out after a few uses and then put aside. Also comes with a medium size dovetail which only has a few signs of use along the edges. Comes with attachment bolts as pictured. Asking for £30, includes UK postage. Payment via Paypal.
  4. Diffraction spike issue

    That's really helpful thanks! I wish I'd also collimated the primary with my laser when I was out there now to see if I got the same result as these two horsehead images show. All my other images have these same two additional spikes on bright stars when I was using the laser for collimation. Then it would have pretty much confirmed it to be the focuser intruding into the light path. It may also explain why the shadow of the secondary shifted when I collimated the primary using a defocused star while outward focusing, then when I defocused the star again using inward focusing it was out of collimation again. I don't think the angle means much. If you rotate the camera in the focuser the spider vane spikes will move position, but the additional spikes stay static. I diagnosed this while I was out there. Also, when I took the image with the spider spikes intersecting the additional spikes the additional ones were coming from the same axis as where the focuser was. I remember meddling with the vanes while I was out there because I thought it might have been them! Seems as though all aspects point to the focuser
  5. Diffraction spike issue

    Hmm you are correct, not the secondary mirror itself. I pointed it down just the open end of the tube to the primary and still saw the pattern. If anything it seemed like the primary was too far up the tube as the mirror wasn't touching all of the locking screws, I'm not sure if having the primary too far up the tube would cause issues? I'm fairly positive that the focuser hasn't obstructed the light path before but will check again on next clear night. I've also had two additional star spikes like this before, I wonder if these issues are connected to the same problem? Close up it looks like there may be more than two additional spikes, they just happen to be closer together unlike the first image. Quite hard to tell. Spider vanes are measured and all the same length, last thing to check is for the bent spider vanes. Can't do much to check any changes until the some clear skies come along! Thanks for help once again.
  6. Diffraction spike issue

    Thanks for the suggestions, rather worryingly I've found that these additional spikes are coming from the actual secondary mirror itself. I put my laser in and can see at the bottom of the telescope (on the primary) these same spikes appear. I thought it may be from the mirror being too tight, but I've loosened the collimation screws and the centre bolt but these same spikes are still apparent.
  7. Hi all, Last night seemed like a good night to try and get collimation of my Quattro 8s sorted once and for all (or so it seemed), but rather than sorting it I've opened up another can of worms! It was the first night where I'd completely ditch the laser for collimating the primary mirror and collimate on a star instead. So I pulled the star (Capella) out of focus and into the middle of the frame to get the concentric rings. The primary was not collimated because the secondary shadow was not centred. So I centred it and took a 30 sec exposure. What I got was a star with the 4 normal diffraction spikes, but on the same axis mirrored quadruple ones! I'm fairly sure nothing was intruding the light path as Capella was pretty much directly overhead. I've had a search around online and seen that extra diffraction spikes can come from twisted vanes but the effect never gave this many diffraction spikes. Other interesting thing to note was that when I moved the star out of focus again the secondary shadow had moved and was no longer central. But when I moved the focuser the other way to defocus the star on the other side of focus it was centred! Would that indicate a focuser that is not sitting square? Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks, Carl
  8. M51 Whirlpool Galaxy +

    You have some nice detail coming through there despite conditions. Only criticism I can give is that it looks a little green, give it a run through Photoshop with Hasta La Vista Green plugin and it should sort it.
  9. First Dark Site Image

    Yes I agree it doesn't look like star trails. Looks like coma that is being exacerbated by a spacing issue. I'm sure I've seen something like this before when people are imaging through an eyepiece projection method.
  10. Bricked my DSLR

    Don't give up hope on it just yet, when I modded my 1000D as part of my dissertation myself and my co-workers had to take it apart and put it back together probably close to 10 times...and that was with 3 different people. Initially there was no response at all when turning the camera on after modifying it..so we called it a day and thought it was probably dead. Next morning we took it apart again and reseated all the ribbon cables again, and like magic, it just happened to work fine again. I'm still using it to this day and have had no technical problems with it at all. Did you mark the ribbon cables with a sharpie or anything of the like? That's one of the things we forgot to do, it seems the ribbon cables are a bit picky on how they want to be seated. Perhaps go back to it another day and do the complete teardown again and try reseating all the cables again? This was what I was recommended to do, and although that was what we had been doing all along we still tried it again the next day and managed to get it working. At least yours was showing some kind of life after modifying, ours was just dead; no error, lcd didn't come on, no led on..not great motivation to keep trying
  11. Neq6 will be fine, my C9.25 is piggybacked with an ST80 on an older style EQ6 and still rock steady. You then have the option to use guidescope or OAG if you choose to autoguide. Most people would swear by an OAG when guiding an SCT, but can initially be a bit fiddly with spacing and getting focus with both cameras. I'd also recommend using the 12dstring FOV calculator or similar if you haven't already, you may find that some DSO's you want to image in the future won't fit fully in the frame (M42, M33, Andromeda etc..), even with the reducer. Other than that SCT's are great for the smaller objects.
  12. Yes you can use a C8 for small planetary nebulas and smaller galaxies, but it also depends on how well you are mounted and how accurate your autoguiding (or lack of) is because of the longer focal length. How are you planning on mounting it?
  13. m78

    Not sure whether you have it activated in PHD2 but it should save and deposit a guide log .txt file somewhere on your computer. If you have the log you can open it with a log viewer and show the graph from there as well as RMS values I believe.
  14. M33 with Quattro and 1000D

    Thanks Martin, I agree the original is a bit too red - can see it especially in the stars. I added a star mask and de-saturated it a little to turn down the redness of the stars while boosting the blue and reducing the red a bit for the rest of the image. Hopefully this is a slight improvement.
  15. M33 with Quattro and 1000D

    Thanks for that, if it were to be collimation would rotating the camera around the focuser change the direction of the worse corner in the image? I imaged M42 on the same night and looking at the images from that it shows that the top left is still the worse corner? Got me thinking perhaps it's something to do with the t-ring/coma corrector not sitting square - maybe even the sensor itself since it was self modified.