Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Better Barlow!


up2nogood

Recommended Posts

Generally, the quality is reflected in the price, but you have given a 2" and a 1.25" barlow to compare. I would 'guess' from the price of the different sized items that they are of similar optical quality. I have the SW deluxe 2x barlow that came with a SW Startravel 80T. It is made of plastic (with glass lens) and won't be of great quality optically, but for a budget barlow it is fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both are of decent quality. As David says the Revelation is a 2" barlow though. Another 1.25" barlow worth considering is the TAL 2x:

First Light Optics - Tal 2x and 3x Barlows

TAL are Russian and though they don't look as "glossy", optically they are very good for their cost.

I agree with John. I use an older Tal 3x and that is optically good and solidly made. I expect the latest ones will be the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Revelation 2.5x Barlow 1.25" size which is poor IMO. I have a 2x Celestron and a "no name" x3 which are much better. Maybe I was unlucky but it's put me off Revelation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Team I was bought a Celestron Ultima 2x Barlow as it had received good reviews on this site... I have to say that it appears to darken my viewing quite a lot... do you think this could be due to the fact I have a small fast scope (at the moment) :icon_salut:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Team I was bought a Celestron Ultima 2x Barlow as it had received good reviews on this site... I have to say that it appears to darken my viewing quite a lot... do you think this could be due to the fact I have a small fast scope (at the moment) :icon_salut:

All barlows will dim the view, so to speak. A 2x barlow will approximately double the f ratio of the scope and effectively make it slower.

On a camera doubling the f ratio means reducing the size of the aperture whilst maintaining the same field of view, but with a scope you cannot change the aperture size and so the field of view shrinks instead. I think that is how it works......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.