Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

Fedele

Members
  • Posts

    859
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Fedele

  1. I have discover this video days agò and published it on a Taka FaceBook group. from that point the success of the video
  2. Hi. I have a FS102NSV. 1) i'm searching an elegant solution, grab and go, nanual just for visual, solid with fluid and extensible movements. Cheap 2) an AZ mount GOTO. I had thought about the AZ / EQ6 OR 5 SKYWATCHER, but the quality is so inconsistent, with various problems and besides they are bulky and heavy. I have to do bino views with the FS and soon put a tube for planetary imaging (2/4 min) mewlon180c, C8 or Mak150, depending on the choice based on the budget for the mount. I was thinking about the Ioptron AZ Pro Mount. what do you tell me_ savings compared to the Sw ed compact. Do you have a management system via mobile devices with a celestial map app like the Nextar Evolution? stable? reliable? I believe that a single answer to the two previous questions could be the AZ100, certainly not cheap, of which the ACTIVE GOT will soon be marketed. Do you know how much this complete setup will cost? could I now take the manual system with flexible hoses and then mount the GOTO? will this be possible?
  3. 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱 🤪 importer say me the the upper The importer says he cleaned the lens and the sopea ones are signs of the cleaning that was drying 🙂 He says that like grains of dust are deposited due to static. 1 Year Importer Warranty !!🦾
  4. For eyepieces i m thinking: - 2 Hyperion 24mm - 2 hyperion 17 mm - i have yet the 1200 FF and the two Orto - 2 Ortho Baader 6 mm later we will see for others more short oculars sounds good?
  5. i have the Baader prism, as i have said, and yes i will buy the nose 2" for it. But i think there is sufficient backfocus, for my MAxbright II, why i need a corrector 1.6 x?
  6. Nuova immagine dall'obiettivo Come sembra?
  7. Yes. right. just writed this in a post in a FB Taka group. "guys" i need help for eyepieces please... read the previous comment with the accessories list
  8. sorry in advance for the long post request clarification and info about accessories and fittings. 1) what you see in the picture is a 2 "extension. I asked for a 2" reducer to be included. Does the tube have the necessary for a correct and standard initial use? 2) I will make a visual use of the telescope, mainly binocular. I have the following accessories park: - prismatic diagonal baader with T-2 Prism 32 # 2456005 - Baader Maxbright II - Baader Click Lock # 2458100 - Baader T-2 Quick Charger # 2456313 - Baader T-2/1 1/4 "Nosepiece # 2458105 - T adapter Ultrashort T-2 SC 7 eyepieces 31.8: - n 2 Baader Classic Ortho 10 mm - n 2 Flat Field 12 mm - n 2 Ultra Flat Field 18 mm 65 ° - n 1 televue Barlow 2x am I missing something about the fittings? as for the eyepieces: the pair of UFF 18mm I would like to give it away because I did not like it: they suffers from parallax which is annoying in binocular. the 12mm are similar, but at the moment I keep them. I liked the baader ortho instead. I like eyepieces without parallax, with a large field, possibly with few lenses. Do you advise me how to best renew (without spending a fortune) the eyepiece set for BINO and mono vision? I like to range from large fields to high magnifications. I was thinking of two or three pairs of eyepieces to use in the turret and then those that are used for the strongest magnifications. 2”? 1 1/4” ? etc I love to look at objects outlined by the field around, and not too short exit pupils. I can't stand parallax. thanks for the help
  9. Oh..... I was told that the new ones are of a different color and that the old ones are no longer found. thanks for the tip. I buy them
  10. is the lens ok in your opinion? pity it doesn't have its original finder and holder and the original fittings
  11. YEEEEEE 🙏 goooo così. grazie molto.
  12. the only problem with these Fs is external fluorite if it deteriorates over time
  13. Yes. An official distributor in the world sells it to me (I had to speak several languages these days :-)) and it has been tested on the optical bench resulting in collimation. so i go. sin is missing the original 6x30. I will find one of the time, the current beliefs being different in color i think I am attaching the photo of the lens. your eyes are more experienced than mine. if it is perfect as they say it id finally may Guy's dreams that happen
  14. Hi, i have found an FS102 NSV (2005). it would sell to me with a one-year warranty at about half the price of the new FC100DZ. what do you think? This permit me to save money for future TAKAthings thanks
  15. i repeat the question: nexstar evolution (adapted in some way) can work with FC-100DZ? thanks
  16. Someone of you, that want to sell me a 120Ed in real perfect conditions?
  17. nexstar evolution adapted in some way, can be a solution? I had it and it's really compact, light and comfortable
  18. I plan to purchase an AZEQ6, to be used for now with the FC100DZ and related other accessories, for now only visual and planetary imaging with webacam (tomorrow who knows DSO photos, but it's not my urgency) and in the future with some 20 / 25 cm for planetary imaging. I love watching AZ and I like being comfortable. But while waiting for future uses, I think at the moment I would find myself an expensive and very bulky and heavy frame. which clashes with the choice of the FC100 devoted to lightness, space saving, practicality, etc. I'm doing it wrong? what other double AZ / EQ, GOTO solution do you recommend? that does not exceed the cost of AZEq6? thanks
  19. 🙂 Finally my old dream comes true. Let's finally enjoy beauty and pleasure, not just technique
  20. Thanks. Obviously!!! 1) I forgot to tell you something. Unfortunately I didn't like the 18 mm UFFs. the build quality is not constant and they suffer from parallax, which is annoying for my taste especially with the turret. I still need to do a new eyepiece park 2) between stock fittings and those I already have, do I already have all the accessories I need for the right use with turret?
  21. Hello. I decided to join the Takahashi club. with the help of this forum i have I understood what my heart was telling me My choice fell on the FC100DZ. just the last doubt, a detail... Am I making better choice than DF and DC? from what I understand the other models should go out of production and the size difference is not that great. It will arrive in May. As I explained in another post, for me the visual field is important (wide star fields, DSO and Planets) strictly in BINOCULAR VISION and HIRES (within the limits of the diameter) with QHY5III462c. thanks
  22. Hi. I decided to join the Takahashi club. My Choice fell on the FC100DZ. It will arrive in May. I had purchased all 31.8 "accessories for the C8Hd. Consider that for me the visual range is important (wide star fields, DSOs and Planets) in BINOCULAR VISION and HIRESimaging (within the diameter limits) with QHY5III462c. Now I have to figure out if I can still use the accessories 31.8 and if it is better for me to switch to a 2 "park. Here are the accessories I currently have: - prismatic diagonal baader with T-2 Prism 32 # 2456005 - Baader Maxbright II - Baader Click Lock # 2458100 - Baader T-2 Quick Charger # 2456313 - Baader T-2/1 1/4 "Nosepiece # 2458105 - T adapter Ultrashort T-2 SC 7 eyepieces 31.8: - n 2 Baader Classic Ortho 10 mm - n 2 Flat Field 12 mm - n 2 Ultra Flat Field 18 mm 65 ° - n 1 televue Barlow 2x In addition to accessories, necessary fittings etc .... Can you tell me an eyepiece park that can cover the needs in binocular and monoocular? (a first layer of choicesof good quality/costo ratio and a second layer as best choice) thanks
  23. is it a conspiracy? just now that I have decided to enter?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.