Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Ibbo!

Moderators
  • Posts

    7,091
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Ibbo!

  1. 8 hours ago, MilwaukeeLion said:

    Yeah, I don't get it sometimes.  C11 seems to always give me nice images of moon with average seeing no issues using barlow or image during daylight.  Planets a different story, seeing needs to be great.  One of reasons I picked up the 178mm, on paper with C-11 it meets planetary critical sampling without use of barlow. 

    Its all seeing dependant esp with the planets being so low.

    I tried the 200mm SCT the other day and looked at Jove with eyepeice and packed away 30 mins later as it was boiling away like mad.

    The jet stream has not been helpfcul this side of the pond either.

  2. 5 minutes ago, xtreemchaos said:

    nice image Steve, with it being so low you have done well and the spot to boot. charl.

    Thanks Charl.

    I reckon its needs to be a few degs higher for the larger scopes to be any good round here.

    • Like 1
  3. 15 hours ago, Kokatha man said:

    A good effort, especially considering elevation & aperture Steve! Nicely processed also!

    Thanks, I am getting up courage to try Winjupos with the 30 or so video runs I did that night.

  4. On 24/05/2019 at 21:42, ollypenrice said:

    How do the linear subs look before stretching? I did use short subs for the core on this target, myself, but they were more of a help than an absolute essential. You might already have more core data than appears here. Just a thought, because you can use a soft stretch of the original data in the same way that you can use short subs.

    Olly

    Olly thanks for the idea but the subs are too saturated for the core.

    But I have located some shorter subs in another folder.

    • Like 1
  5. 27 minutes ago, ollypenrice said:

    How do the linear subs look before stretching? I did use short subs for the core on this target, myself, but they were more of a help than an absolute essential. You might already have more core data than appears here. Just a thought, because you can use a soft stretch of the original data in the same way that you can use short subs.

    Olly

    I will have a try

    • Like 1
  6. 10 minutes ago, Davey-T said:

    Had a squint through the scope this morning and didn't bother imaging, faint proms on both rims and a small bright spot on the East side maybe, couldn't swear to it, can't see it on your image so probably wishful thinking :grin:

    Dave

    Thanks Dave.

    I have not bothered today as fighting the fluffy things for a near blank disc is too much like work.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.