Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Paul M

Members
  • Posts

    4,249
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Paul M

  1. Hi Paul, only just spotted your response. Here is the image again but solved and saved as a FITS file, so that should have the solution in the header, I think? 1226034964_M332022-12-1455x60LEQMODHEQ56ZWOASI071MCPro_stacked.thumb.jpg.5a05d24a9e152b902a09306b3412634a.fits While playing I also found R14 but I didn't annotate it. The yellow box in the attached image is not related to anything I just managed to pollute the JPG image with some clutter.
  2. Very nicely processed. Only looking at it on my phone but it looks great. Nice stars too.
  3. I'm a recipient of your Globs list Paul but have had little chance to use it. But your image above got me thinking... I imaged M33 about a year ago but lost the stacked FITS file in a spectacularly successful but entirely unintended wiping of my imaging drive in January. However, I did post a JPEG of that image and I've found it in my attachments list on the forum. It's not the best image but ASTAP did plate solve it, which allowed my to do some annotating of some of the globs on this list: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/M33-GLOBULAR-CLUSTER-TARGET-LIST_tbl1_230984922 The last one one the list is within the confines of my image but seemingly too faint. Any others on the list but not annotated are outside the the frame. I'm quite chuffed, and as always, thanks for posting your off-the beaten-track images.
  4. Definitely this! My fondest astro memories are of watching the late summer constellations slowly set in an increasingly dark autumn sky. Just my own eyes. The milky way is lost to my home site with light pollution and aging eyes but the constellation are still captivating. Remembering old asterisms and guideposts to the less known Constellation...
  5. It is difficult to work out what's going on, but I guess running it through Starnet or some such would leave a bland image!
  6. As above, great job. A big plus is that you haven't pushed it too far. It's a very pleasant image that reflects the low surface brightness of the outer arms. I know I'd have strangled it to death!
  7. That's great report of a very productive session. All your images are excellent, but if I had to choose one as a favorite, it would be the first of your planetaries in Cygnus, NGC7048, very nicely captured.
  8. That's brilliant. I don't think I've been introduced to this Arp previously. My own experience with Arp objects hasn't been so good!
  9. That's some image! Gravitational lensing is the ultimate cosmic scale target for amateurs I think. I had a go at the Cosmic Horseshoe earlier this year but my results were less spectacular!
  10. My last outing was in April. Some weather got in the way in late spring, then the nice weather coincided with light summer nights. Now it's getting dark again, but the weather... It has been terrible lately but I'm beginning to think I'm using the weather as an excuse! So today I decided I'd have a play with just my DSLR on a tripod, get some wide field shots, maybe. The sky had other ideas but I did blow off the cobwebs and played with Ekos to control the imaging. I'll be honest, as a session it was a total loss but as a few hours under the stars, playing with stuff, well, I'm happy. I will get the big toys out soon, no, I will!
  11. I hadn't really noticed to be honest, but you've already posted a lightened version, which I'd agree is an improvement. Nice to see simple and well executed constellation images. These days a lot of folk seem to refer to some constellations in terms of their brightest DSO; "Triangulum" for M33, "Andromeda" for M31 and, well I thought the list was longer... 😁
  12. That's really nice! Other than The Plough, I was also drawn to Bootes. It's there in all its glory! I remember Bootes as one of the larger, faint constellations that was easily recognisable as a boy. These days I rarely get to see it all from a dark site. You captured it just perfectly. Not an over busy image that would otherwise drown the constellation.
  13. Well, that's my aspirations dashed on the rocks, rescued and thrown back in... 😂 That's a cracking image!
  14. Yeah, it'd be all about the location and usability for me. My own 10" RC scope would be great on an observatory class mount, in a remote observatory, far away from cloudland UK. It's not the scope that limits my enjoyment, it's the light pollution, weather and endless summer daylight that spoil it for me.
  15. Doing anything right just feels wrong to me! Y'all end up in a furrow... 🤣
  16. And another thing, it's important that we remain happy to share our images/thoughts/problems, so that we can all continue to learn and not set such a high bar that newcomers are intimidated by other's efforts. I'd like to think that I'm a trailblazer in that matter! I'll share images, however trashy they are, if only because there is some aspect that particularly interests me. An example being sharing an image that contains just a few pixels, barely above the visually painful noise, of a gravitationally lensed supernova. Surely there is something to be learned from every image? Whether that be some esoteric processing technique that might not interest astronomers, or something purely astronomical that doesn't interest imagers.
  17. I'm not geared up for M31, but I'd be mighty pleased with this image. The thing is, it's big, real big, but it ain't easy!
  18. Brilliant images. My favorites are: 1) The Aurora 2) Sprites, (a particular interest of mine.) 3) Moon v Mars, but it's surely contrived. At that image scale, motions will have prohibited any kind of stacking for a single frame? Or it's one "lucky" image!
  19. I didn't expect my silly figure to be mathematically analysed. Let's just say, space exploration isn't important to most people. I've followed space science all my life and even I think there are better ways to use our wealth and technology than messing up some other planet... because we can.
  20. Mars, for sure, because it's there and doable within the realms of current technology. Venus, no. Actually, maybe there's a way to pipe some of Venus' thick atmosphere to Mars? 😁 In any case, I prefer the money to be spent on society here and now. As a guess, I'd say 99.99999999999% of the global population have no interest in nor will benefit from exploring other planets.
  21. I've no idea what or where this object is, but that blue star is mesmerising. It actually gives the impression of dazzling the eyes, as though it's brighter than my screens backlight!
  22. I think that is much of the pleasure of imaging for me. I don't have a smart scope... yet... but with my own big old imaging rig I usually sit and watch a live stack building up from my reclining armchair, even though I'll usually do a full process later, in the cold light of day! Anyway, it all looks very promising from you early adopter guys! Certainly a new chapter in sharing and outreach.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.