Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

  • Announcements

    SGL 2017 SP

Thommy

Advanced Members
  • Content count

    60
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About Thommy

  • Rank
    Nebula

Profile Information

  • Location
    Stenloese, Denmark
  1. Thanks, actually that was the recommendation I was thinking of! /Thommy
  2. Is there a recommendation regarding resolution of guide setup compared to imaging setup? I think I have seen some guide lines, but I can't find it again. /Thommy
  3. NGC7331 and Stephan's Quintet.

    Stunning .... So much detail. On my screen, I can clearly see the IFN. /Thommy
  4. Really no advice on how to fix the internal extender of the original MN190 focuser? /Thommy
  5. Dear all, I recently bought a new MN190 that is going to be used for deep sky photography. I am quite satisfied with the focuser except for the internal extension tube. Even when it's not extracted, the camera and FW wobbles quite a bit. Any of you had a fix to this problem? My idea is to bolt it to the focuser and use external extension rings if needed. But this is easier if the internal extension tube is removed from the focuser first - do any of you know how it is fixed to the focuser? By the way, I don't want to replace the focuser with a moonlite or similar - just fix the original. Thanks, /Thommy
  6. Julian Shaw's sombrero - with a surprise!

    Very interesting, indeed. It has been demonstrated before that object S/N is independent of f-ratio. However, aperture and exposure time are important. Perhaps that is the effect we see here. Take a look at the argumentation here http://www.stanmooreastro.com/f_ratio_myth.htm /Thommy
  7. Advice for new guide cam

    Yeah, that's another option. The thing is that I need to buy an adapter to make my old guide camera (T2 thread) fit the OAG (C thread) and probably an extender as well to keep both cameras at focus simultaneously. That is why I consider to replace the guide camera. But of course if the new guide camera has a T2 thread as well, I have to get the adapter anyway. My idea was to wait for your recommendations, and if those guide cameras all need the adapter, I would start with the adapter and old camera first, and if this sensitive enough, I would stick to that, as you are suggesting - thanks!
  8. Dear all, My old QHY5 still works flawlessly, but since I plan to change from guide scope guiding to OAG, I consider a replacement with a more sensitive guide camera. So in your opinion, what is the best suited guide camera right now for OAG use? FYI, my telescope has a focal length of 1000mm and the pixelsize of my imaging camera is 8,2 x 8.4 (same chip as in SX Lodestar x2). Thanks, Thommy
  9. M 109

    Excellent image! I like the "well-done but not over-done" processing that you always use. What a season you had! /Thommy
  10. NGC 4395 unbarred spiral galaxy

    Hallo Jens, I only saw this nice capture now - it's really magnificent - nice color, good tracking, not too dark background etc. I noticed on your homepage that you use off axis guiding on your newtonian - do you have any problems with that setup? Sometimes you hear people saying that OAG and newtonians is not a good fit. When I started studying astronomy back in 91' I was also attracted by dwarf galaxies somehow. Perhaps because each dwarf galaxy is unique - there is no "typical" dwarf galaxy. Also their stellar generations are well separated in time which allows us to study each generation isolated for the others. There were no scientists who worked with dwarf galaxies at Copenhagen University at the time, I was ready to decide for a thesis, but I discovered that there was a British professor at Nordita in Copenhagen, who had worked with dwarf galaxies for many years. It turned out that he was very enthusiastic to become my instructor for my thesis - what a wonderful time! Now astronomy is just my hobby. /Thommy
  11. Cge pro or just poor?

    It would be nice to hear experience from other CGE PRO owners - in particular those who use it for high resolution imaging, so you know what to expect. As I mentioned above, my CGEM has a very similar behavior to your CGE pro. I would like to image at around 0.8 "/px, and I'm fully aware that it will not be with my current mount. I consider either an EQ8 or a Mesu, depending on my mood the day I take the decision. /Thommy
  12. Cge pro or just poor?

    Perhaps you should chenck the balance first. Then check if the gears binds or there is excessive backlash. Is the scale on the guide graph correct so peak to peak in RA is roughly 3"? It´s pretty much the same guide graph I see with my CGEM! Even though the CGE pro is more expensive, I don´t think the build quality is better than for, say CGEM. In other Words - don´t expect too much. It is possible to tune the Mount. Perhaps that's one thing to consider. /Thommy
  13. EQ8 experience

    Yes, your guiding is really good. My total RMS is typically around 1.35"
  14. EQ8 experience

    Your total RMS seems to be 0.25". Perhaps there was a missing "." ? RMS is not pr. pixel. Thommy
  15. EQ8 experience

    All comments are helpful! Sara, I don´t understand your 35"/px - that´s quite a lot. /Thommy
×