Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

alan potts

Moderators
  • Posts

    11,015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by alan potts

  1. 5 hours ago, wimvb said:

    Thank you,  Alan. There are a few images of this object posted on Astrobin recently. But imo, not many really do this gem justice.

    I see you took it with an M/N 190, I have one sitting in the corner of my observatory which hasn't seen light for about 3 years. Maybe it's time to mount it up the CEM 60 I have should carry it easily enough.

    Alan

  2. I have a number of items to maybe pass on to get better use by others but am totally un-aware of what the rules are now for selling to the UK. I could of course just advertise sales to within the EU using the forum but that to me seems a bit unfair on my countrymen.

    I have not decided what will be up for grabs but it will be decent quality stuff.

    Alan

  3. 2 minutes ago, simmo39 said:

    Hi and thanks for the reply. I was just wondering as my ASI 1600 seems so stable. Thanks for putting my mind to rest.

    Mine do go up and down, say it is set at minus 5 it varies between 4.7 and 5.3 not quickly but over say 3-4 minutes. In fact it rarely reads minus5.

    Alan

  4. 52 minutes ago, astro mick said:

    Great work Alan,you have definately captured more dust than me.It is a lovey thing though.

    Mick.

    My sky generally is superb Mick, and I get about 11 degrees on your location, it all helps. You can always add to your data and I am sure you will brush my effort aside very soon,

    Alan

  5. 45 minutes ago, astro mick said:

    Thanks Alan,just seen yours though.😪

    Mick.

    I took mine at F7 on my 115mm APO I am a little surprised you were not showing more dust lanes on yours as nice as it is, I did have a fair bit of data though. I can remember not long back when 2 hours was tops, amazing what a difference it makes.  I need to polish my guiding up though, I must sort this OAG out, I have only had it 2 years.

    Alan

  6. 3 minutes ago, scotty38 said:

    Great image and yep as above I can see the artifacts both sides here.

    Your correct too, maybe from dither or the fact that I spent a few nights on it and only ever line up by eye, not a very good eye in this case.

    Alan.

     

    • Like 1
  7. 58 minutes ago, almcl said:

    Wow, you've really caught the dust there, Alan.  Nice work!

    It might be my screen (or imagination!) but there seem to be some darker artefacts on the left edge and I wonder if these are interfering slightly with the dynamic range.  perhaps cropping them out and re-balancing would show a different result?

    No your correct it is where having shot this target about 5 nights and have not lined up spot on, could also be artifacts from dither. Thanks for the kind words and I will redo it.

    Alan

  8. I have now collected 13 hours on this though I have lost a chunk as hazy cloud I felt was spoiling the finished capture, maybe there are still a few but with over 200 3 minute subs I got a bit fed up of looking so went with a percentage selection to hopefully weed them out. I do feel that having read something Olly wrote some time ago, something like, I use to do 3 captures a night now I do 3 nights on one capture, and followed it my work has improved a tad.

     

    247559266_Autosavecopy.thumb.jpg.9cc2f9a700c272cfbbc9537364e20a8c.jpg

     

    Feel free to comment on processing which is an area many can always improve on. I have tried to keep it feeling natural

    Alan

    • Like 20
  9. I don't have a light pollution problem really around me, the odd street lamp but that's about it. Yes LED type lights from town do lighten the sky to the south east but that's 4 miles or more away. What annoys me it the lighting left on all night high on the hill way across the other side of the river, it's over 3 miles so not an issue of LP,  it lights the old town area that absolutely no one goes to other than during the day and even then we are talking very few, I can't imagine why anyone would be up there at 10 at night, it's just a waste of electricity.

    Alan

  10. Well I think everything was thrown at this 8 hour effort from hazy cloud to poor guiding and even a touch of frost on everything, and not a sign of David Jason. This is just over 8 hours and a 94% selection of the frames which were 3 minute on an 071 at 800mm.

    I think I may well add to this as more an more comes out as I build up the data, lots of colours coming into play here and I am not totally sure if they are there or whether I am manufacturing them, if I am I have tried to keep it sort of natural.

     

    Autosave001.thumb.jpg.036ae79671a3bd365709e26be1e29732.jpg

     

    Feel free to offer advice, it is only you lot that have got me to this point, Best wishes to everyone.

    Alan

    • Like 19
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.