Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

alan potts

Moderators
  • Posts

    11,015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by alan potts

  1. My understanding of it is the masters are the collection of frames. For example I shoot about 25 Darks at a given temperature with the camera then the same number of Flats and Dark Flats. After that I just use the masters every time. I only redo them if I move the camera in the telescope.

    Going back to the days where i just used  a Canon 40D and 7D you can't control temperature, some do shoot Darks after sessions though I never bothered, I never bother shooting Flats etc no matter what the temperature though a dare say the purist would say you should. I think the only reason no one answered is that it got buried in the pile, it happens, hope my limited expierence is of some use.

    Alan

  2. 15 hours ago, Neil27 said:

    @alan potts have you managed to image with the Stella mira 85mm at all, interested to know your thoughts?

    I did manage a number of images with is though there was clearly a problem with the scope, centre was razor sharp but diagonally edges in one axis now so. We believed the focuser was sagging a little though I am not so sure myself. It was sold on this as a strong point and to me seemed odd it should be letting it down. It was a well made scope and looked quality. I wish now I had tried a sleeve in the focuser to see if it helped. It was returned and FLO did not have another to replace it with, I was very disappointed as it promised so much, FLO were first rate about it all and I received a full refund. In view of mine being at the very start of a run I imagine these things happen. Still want a scope in this F/L range but now with UK leaving the EU I guess I just soldier on with what I have.

    Alan

  3. A very nice start, you have some lovely colours coming through there, as you say nice to see. I can't see that sort of colour even with a fairly large 18 inch scope. Something to build on but there are so many things to trip you up in this hobby, I am still making mistakes and i don't think I'm on my own.

    Alan

    • Like 1
  4. Shot a mixture of 2,3 and 4minute subs on this with normal Darks,Flats etc, and dithered every second shot. Total is 3 hours 10mins on a 183mc connected to my Borg 77ED ll at F4.3. Still finding this difficult to focus but don't see laying out the best part of 500e for a Feather-touch really worth it. I feel I have been getting better results from this scope of late and I also feel this is down to less messing with setting, now i leave things the same all the time.

    Starless.thumb.jpg.fecc88f4bfd4dd6e91b406491b2adb0a.jpg

     

    Any advice would be most welcome, just don't feel I am nailing the guiding like I did last year, or maybe the focus

    Thanks for looking.

    Alan

    • Like 5
  5. That's as good as any I have seen and much better than my effort a couple of years back, I always feel you do good jobs on all your targets, your M106 was really lovely.

    Alan

    • Thanks 1
  6. 11 minutes ago, Grant Fribbens said:

    Hi Alan,

    I bet the mouse issue gets frustrating. I was taking some flats the other day and I got a strange circle shape in the middle of the image and I do not know what was causing it. But I altered the position on the LED tracing pad with a sheet of A4 and ran the process again and everything was fine. I have found that when I use SharpCap and use some of its sliders it can alter the settings of the main imaging camera. With the beta versions of APT and N.I.N.A you can set them to set the gain and offset prior to imaging and that has helped. I once found I had different gain and offset settings to my dark library and APP certainly made the stacked image look rather wierd.

    Grant

    Its fine, it's the off-set, thanks a lot you've solved the problem.

    Alan

    • Like 1
  7. 8 minutes ago, Grant Fribbens said:

    Hi Alan,

    I bet the mouse issue gets frustrating. I was taking some flats the other day and I got a strange circle shape in the middle of the image and I do not know what was causing it. But I altered the position on the LED tracing pad with a sheet of A4 and ran the process again and everything was fine. I have found that when I use SharpCap and use some of its sliders it can alter the settings of the main imaging camera. With the beta versions of APT and N.I.N.A you can set them to set the gain and offset prior to imaging and that has helped. I once found I had different gain and offset settings to my dark library and APP certainly made the stacked image look rather wierd.

    Grant

    I think you may have hit the nail on the head, I change my off set for this run as I noticed it was set on 60 where as I normally have it on 20, this may have something to do with it, just now trying a stacking with no Cal frames. Last night was superb here and everything that I could do wrong, i did.

    Alan

  8. 15 minutes ago, Grant Fribbens said:

    I found when I got unusual results I took a look at the FITS headers and found that the gain and offset had changed between my dark and light frames and that causes all sorts of strange things to happen. One I took some replacement darks for the same settings everything was fine again. Maybe worth a check.

    I have had a problem with my mouse and it's been double clicking even when I only single click. I am wondering if it has done something unknown to me. Just stacked and tried a set of 13 images of Leo Triplet and that looks fine. I have to say my Flat don't look right, way too dark and it wasn't.

    Alan

  9. 31 minutes ago, happy-kat said:

    Using my mobile phone there is nothing obviously wrong, the right star has a violet centre but what are you seeing that prompted this post?

    Everything is red and I can't get out of it, the star before I recall coming out yellow. I have not stretched it at all just balanced the background and it still looks red, I've never seen anything like this before in all my efforts which generally are not bad

  10. I am not expert, far from it but generally I do turn out a reasonable image. I use here an 071 OSC, on an APO at 800mm F/L, focus is a tad out but not miles and I have an Astronomik L2 UV/IR filter screwed toe Hutech flatener.

    I use DSS and no setting were altered from the last 10 images at least, Any ideas what's wrong as I see something is? This is 20x 4 minutes at Unity settings with Darks etc, all images look fine on their own.

    Autosave002.thumb.jpg.0cf733ed8f7c10653bc15201a1be852d.jpg

     

    Hope someone can help, I have tried a few combinations of with and without Flats etc, same result.

    Alan

  11. 52 minutes ago, newbie alert said:

    Nice Alan, it's the tadpoles nebula next to flaming star.. monkey head is in orion( I think)

    So it is, I could make out a bit of a monkey head sort of shape and looked no further. I have photographed the Monkey's Head before but with the C-Du-C showing only SH-2 numbers and NGC No's I got a bit mixed up. Thanks for putting me right.

    Alan

    • Like 2
  12. Something of an annoying night towards the end of session, patchy cloud diffing by that always happened in the last minute of exposure, but I still got 2 and half hours on the Flaming Star and Monkeys Head i think.

    578312725_Monkeyheadandflamingstar.thumb.jpg.a3cc9e09591eb4e80941243461e8f6e0.jpg

    Taken with the Borg 77EDll 38x4min subs with calibration frames as well as dither.

    Alan

    • Like 7
  13. 2 hours ago, fwm891 said:

    Thanks Alan - Yes but for me it's waiting for things to get out of a bank of trees to my SE.

    I know the feeling, I have a very large area here with some beautiful old walnut trees 80-90yo, lovely for the walnuts but one of them masks the darkest part of my sky to the SW, there's nothing for miles and miles.

    Alan

    • Sad 1
  14. 1 hour ago, Iceman120 said:

    Great images Alan.

    For gradient software there is a plug in for photoshop if you have it but it costs 60 dollars.

    GradientXTerminator (rc-astro.com)

    There is a free trial though

    Yes I understand that Iceman but I do not like to use credit cards on the net, or anywhere for that matter as I had mine copied once in HongKong. I am going to look at the Pixel Processor with an intent to buy this I believe has a gradient tool included. I can do gradients with PS on many images but wide field like this is very difficult, or at least I don't know of way. I personally feel $ 60 for a plug in is rather steep, no matter how good it may be.

    Alan 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.