Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

wormix

Members
  • Posts

    534
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by wormix

  1. 16 minutes ago, StuartJPP said:

    I doubt that it would be the LCD then.

    It can definitely be the viewfinder causing it, best cover it up for next time to see if it helps.

    If your darks aren't showing similar issues it will almost certainly be that.

    Had another session last night - still to look at the data but did an auto-stretch in APT of my flats and they show a similar pattern even with lcd definitely off and viewfinder covered. 
     

    At least now with some decent flats & bias I can cancel it out. 
     

     

  2. 15 minutes ago, StuartJPP said:

    Was the rear LCD on at the time? I.e. was the LCD displaying the shutter timer during the exposure?

    I've seen a similar pattern on captured frames when the LCD of my 650D was on during some testing.

    Unsure as it was swivelled round (does that automatically turn it off?) and I was using remote via APT. 
     

    I did wonder if it was some stray light entering via the viewfinder?

  3. Update - pressed a button in GIMP to display Logarithmic histogram, so wasn't DSS at all.

    Talk about learning curve!

    Out again tonight, going to try at ISO800 this time, and potentially drop the exposure down to 120seconds.  Will also get some decent light frames.

    Cheers
     

  4. 5 hours ago, wxsatuser said:

    What about some decent flats.

    did some really quick and dirty flats and bias this evening to see if it had any effect and its made a world of distance - all that area of exposure has gone.


    onto another issue now, where i cant seem to get a nice clear histogram after messing with DeepSkyStacker settings earlier!

  5. 39 minutes ago, JamesF said:

    Do make sure you get the MOSFETs the right way around.  I didn't use the recommended ones for my build thread and I think the pictures in my thread are a bit misleading as to their orientation.  I keep meaning to open up one of the units and replace the photo with something more obvious.

    I did also find at least one diode had leads of too large a diameter for the holes in the board, but I can't recall which ones off the top of my head.  I may mention it in my build thread.  I ended up just mounting the diodes on fly leads and wrapping them with heatshrink in the end.  My component list says that D1 and D3 through D5 are 1N5822 and D2 is a 10A10.

    James

    perfect, thank you!

  6. Still not getting bored - latest addition is a 1.25” desiccant cap. 
     

    Does anyone know of any reason why PLA might not be suitable for keeping within the scope?  Is it inert or could it release anything that could damage my lens?

     

    The guidescope rings are working a treat - I’m getting 5min subs no problems at all so obviously no flexure

    9CADDFED-4FDA-4A6B-B458-6D06ED464225.jpeg

    D9C55631-C650-4FBF-B762-C17B0ADA06EA.jpeg

    70DAC046-7DBA-492B-8A46-716E6167E2DC.jpeg

  7. On 24/08/2020 at 10:08, Mark at Beaufort said:

    Lucksall looks really good after the terrible flood 'Dennis' we had earlier in the year. I assume the road to Fownhope is still being repaired which was estimated to be the end of September.

    Glad that Gary is keeping the site up to his usually standards

    You can’t tell it was inundated now - the grass is pristine as are all the facilities. 
     

    Staff have been great, all in all been a great trip away - stars even came out late last night. Unfortunately it was blowing about 3billion mph so didn’t fancy getting my SA out for some shots!

     

    Will certainly be back, hopefully for a future SGL. 

    • Like 1
  8. On 18/08/2020 at 12:26, John78 said:

    Its M51x0.75, but you'll need to adjust up and down in OD until you get a nice fit as FDM type printers are pretty variable in terms of printed dimensions vs cad dimensions, and you need to print at 0.1mm layers or less, it also helps not having complete 360 threads.

    Found the sweet spot after lots of trial and error.  For my printer and materials, 50.75mm x0.75 and 25.5mm x 0.75 worked

    • Like 1
  9. I have recently acquired a 3D printer so set to work printing all and sundry, including some items for my new Megrez. 
     

    Currently have a Bahtinov mask from thingiverse and 2 of my own designs created using Fusion 360. 
     

    First up is a screw mount to convert a 9x50 finder to guidescope - the only design on thingiverse involves removing the front filter so I decided to modify to allow direct connection.  Couldn’t find the specs online so a lot of trial and error involved but gave a good introduction to both Fusion and 3D printing in general. 
     

    Second is a guidescope mount to fit the unorthodox finder shoe on the Megrez. I could have swapped out for a traditional Vixen style, even have one in my spares box - but where’s the fun in that!?  Also wanted to be able to use the WO red dot finder I have. Couple of iterations as the first design was unnecessarily tall and introduced some flex, plus the fore/aft motion was a bit much so I added in some stats front and back to brace it against the OTA. Also did a couple of M5 screws, just because I could!  
     

    Printed 100% fill and it is rock solid with no perceivable movement, but will see what PHD2 says when I finally get a clear night. Eventually I may even print it in gold silk to match the Meg. 

    One day I’ll get bored of this 3D printing lark, but still going strong at the moment!

    45DCA204-7F3F-424B-9F80-7B4652F7CA9E.jpeg

    06739E1E-CC41-4C49-AAB7-57CDDD1EF941.jpeg

    AF48F4C5-E0C3-49C8-AE48-DB21A04AA3AD.jpeg

    0C401DD4-E1AD-4253-9FFD-4294F58E025D.jpeg

    80A8FAA3-00B6-4E1E-961C-A29D8AACB256.jpeg

    • Like 6
  10. My village shows as both Bortle 4 and 5 according to CO and lightpollutionmap. 
     

    Clicking on my house it’s a 5, literally the other side of the road it’s 4. So let’s say 4.5

     

    Regardless, have fantastic skies considering I’m only 25miles from London with only the odd annoyance of being on the Luton flight path when the wind is in the right (wrong?) direction. 

  11. Just now, discardedastro said:

    Oh, that's neat. I've got some aluminium tape which I'm using to wrap my enclosure (aside from the home) to help reject solar load - it'll also completely reject UV. Could layer that and/or black flocking over the PLA and it'd be fine for extended use I'm sure.

    That’s a good shout - I have some very thick black felt and aluminium tape that may work. 
     

    Although is the issue more heat rather than direct sunlight, as looking at this thread the internals can get pretty toasty! 

  12. Picked up my 3D printer (having a whole world of fun with that!) and finally finished fixing my pi into its enclosure. 
     

    It’s just proof of concept tat the mo, as the mount is printed in PLA and I doubt that will stand up to direct sunlight. Will play with ABS once I’m more familiar with the printer. 
     

    Anyway - photo below, power will run out the base, down a pipe and into a solar charger battery.  Need to source some neoprene or similar to seal the dome. 

    32613E6F-09FE-47E5-96FC-46F0EA088337.jpeg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.