Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

fwm891

Members
  • Posts

    4,144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by fwm891

  1. First clear skies last night for over a month. This group of objects I've tried before but never had a reasonable run with no moon around. Although fog put an end to captures around 10 ish I think the data I did get was worth it.

    Details:

    Subs: 9x 180s, 11x300s and 10x480s 

    Camera: ASI294MC Pro (gain 122 offset 30)

    OTA: RASA 8

    Mount: iOptron CEM60 Standard - guided with TS80 guide-scope and ASI120MM-S

    Capture: SG Pro

    Process: PI and tweaks in PS-CS3

     

    NGC7635andCo_Final.png

    • Like 3
  2. After looking at a video thread re adapting a Nikon Z body to take filters (https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/344270-nikon-z-with-astro-filters/) it made me think of my Lumix GX80 which has interchangeable lenses and I have an adapter to take non 4/3rd's Nikon lenses on the GX80...

    Turns out the internal thread was 46mm x 0.75mm so not an off-the-shelf adapter size. So I set about making an adapter this morning. First photo shows the adapter with a 1.25" red filter in place, photo2 shows the filter inside the Nikon lens adapter mounted on the GX80. photos 3 and 4 show the Lumix with a 70-200mm Nikon lens attached. The red image is the lens/camera combo pointed to the overcast sky showing almost no vignetting at full aperture (f2.8). Probably use this with a UV/IR cut filter on a scope - currently raining so no chance to test the mods. TBC...

     

    Adapter mod1.jpg

    Adapter mod2.jpg

    Adapter mod3.jpg

    Adapter mod4.jpg

    Adapter mod-Sky.jpg

  3. Great description and video.

    Immediately made me grab my Panasonic Lumix (4/3rds chip) GX80. This has interchangeable lenses and I have a Nikon to Lumix 4/3rds adapter which at a quick glance looks like I too can insert 1.25" filters into... One of the exposed threads inside the adapter eyeba;lls at about 42mm - if so I can get a 42mm to 1.25" filter stepdown male to female ring. 🙏

  4. Quick session earlier this evening before rain came....

    Subs: 10x 180s, 10x 300s

    RASA 8 on CEM60

    Capture: SG Pro

    Processing: APP, PI and PS.

    Moon 90+% illuminated

     

    Sh2_101_RASA_clone_DBE.png

    • Like 3
  5. NGC6888 in Cygnus.

    Shot this evening before cloud called a stop to proceedings. 

    Subs: 9x 180seconds + 4x300seconds

    RASA + plus IDAS NB-1 filter

    iOptron CEM60 guided with 9x50mm finder/guider.

    Capture: SG Pro

    Processing: To Integration - APP, then PI for colour and resizing.

    Francis

     

    NGC6888_and_surround_Flip.png

    NGC6888_RASA_NB-1_Anno_fltn.png

    • Like 5
  6. I've knocked-up a new filter tray from a block of Delrin. Photos show (I hope) the differences between the original and the Delrin tray. Straight off the machine so needs some cleaning up. I still have to cut the 48mm thread for the filters and fit a suitable ejector pin and pull handle.

    As yet I have no collimation problem straight out of the box. Because the RASA's corrector lens assembly is fixed it doesn't (hasn't) needed collimation. Hyperstar is a different matter as from what I've read is an absolute pain to collimate when it's added and when removed to use the original secondary.

    I have an Astrozap metal dew shield for my Edge HD 8 which fits the RASA 8, this has it's own dust cap...

    Delrin tray-1.jpg

    Delrin tray-2.jpg

    • Like 2
  7. Caution: Celstron RASA 8 and Baader UFC filter changer problems.

    I’ve just purchased a Celestron RASA 8 from First Light Optics (FLO) which is great, no problems with the RASA 8. My problems came when I wanted to fit a filter changer to the RASA 8 to take advantage of the new (ish) multi narrow band filters available for OSC cameras, specifically in my case an ASI 294MC Pro.

    I bought a Baader Universal Filter Changer (UFC) from a fellow StarGazersLounge (SGL) member. The UFC was in pristine condition and from looking at Baader’s specification sheet showing all the adapter plates for the UFC’s base (#24591110) I could initially see no problem in finding the right front and back plates to suit. Wrong.

    The problem for RASA 8 users is the shorter back focal distance 25mm from the front of the RASA 8, T threaded mounting plate (29mm from the front of the central lens assembly mounting).

    For me to achieve this spacing I had to mount the UFC backwards onto the RASA’s T threaded mounting plate (Baader part number #2459126) would have been fine and kept the UFC facing the right way IF there had been a female mounting plate for the ASI 294MC Pro for the other side.

    The UFC came with a #2459130 female mounting plate in to which the 294MC fitted. I now had to fit the UFC to the RASA.

    I’ve ended up machining a new mounting plate for the UFC as there are no female T threaded plates. This has allowed me to attain the 25mm spacing required but it’s left me with having to insert filters with the wrong face to the sky (RASA side). I emailed Baader (AKA-David Hinds) to ask if there were other mounting plates or a modified filter drawer so filters could be inserted correctly – no, was the basic reply. So I had to think about how to get round the problem or reversed filters.

    Solution (for me) has been to make a modified filter drawer so filters can be inserted the correct way round. Currently in a mock-up state (which fits the UFC base unit) I’m awaiting materials to make the final thing. The photos show the original Baader UFC with the wood mock-up. Differences should be evident but what I’ve basically done is to move the filter mounting plate from one side of the filter drawer to the other.

    Final photo shows the plate I've made to attach the UFC to the RASA male T threaded mounting.

    F Milsom 2nd November 2019.

    Original&mock-up_1.jpg

    Original&mock-up_2.jpg

    Original&mock-up_3.jpg

    Slider_mod.jpg

    • Like 1
  8. Portrayed horizontal for those who like it laying down.

    Details:

    Camera: ASI 294MC Pro cooled to -20°C, gain 122, offset 30.

    Subs: Four panels each 4x 120s.

    Processing: APP (cosmetic correction and stacking) panels saved as tiff. Photoshop manual joining of the panels and tidying the joins, PI for colour work, back to PS to tidy up and save to jpg for display.

    Mount iOptron CEM60 Standard on Tri-pier

    Scope Celestron RASA 8 with IDAS NB-1 filter.

     

     

    Flame2M42_RASA-2.jpg

    • Like 5
  9. My own fault (I was the only one there so can't blame anyone else 🤫).

    I woke about 3 am this morning and looked out on stars 😀, so down stair open the obs, grab a coffee, down to business...

    I did a quick frame/mosaic sequence in SG Pro covering the area between the flame and M42 - 4 panels. I set-up to do 4 x 120s subs per panel to see what I'd get. Trouble was I miss judged the rotation on the top panel with the flame neb - set the sequence going only to come back 20 mins later to see that they were rotated by a long way. Let the sequence finish the 4 panels, closed down and back to bed...

    Because of the rotated frames I've had to heavily crop the image each side. Must try harder (heard that somewhere before!)

    Flame-2-M42 Test_RASA.jpg

    • Like 9
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.