Jump to content

Stargazers Lounge Uses Cookies

Like most websites, SGL uses cookies in order to deliver a secure, personalised service, to provide social media functions and to analyse our traffic. Continued use of SGL indicates your acceptance of our cookie policy.

sgl_imaging_challenge_banner_dslr_mirrorlesss_winners.thumb.jpg.9deb4a8db27e7485a7bb99d98667c94e.jpg

Recommended Posts

The weather has been so bad I have had the time to finish a video on using astro filters with the Nikon Z bodies and Nikon camera lenses. There is a manual alternative to the FTZ allowing 1.25 inch filters to be fitted between camera and F-mount lenses, and for some lenses and end of lens solution make sense. FAstroTZ is described here:
 

 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a well presented video with most things covered I think. 

As a Nikon Z user myself I hope to see some more if you get the urge :) I don't use mine on a scope but only with lenses and not where I need filters. I find the layout of the body way better than any other camera ( DSLR ) I've used.

Dave.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Weather in UK is dire at moment. Biblical rain. I’ll get out eventually. But on the matter of “need” there are all kinds of projects. I picked up my Halpha filters today at the Astronomy show with a view to seeing if I can synthetically astro mod the Z6 in a less crude way, given that it appears to capture a bit over 20%. 
 

The layout is great and having focus peaking give you a first fix is amazing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a very informative video and an interesting solution to the problem of using filters with the Nikon Z cameras.

The approach probably works well for lenses but I think 1.25" filters will cause vignetting issues when attaching the camera to a scope.

Mark

Edited by sharkmelley
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a DSLR lens (Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K) to mirrorless camera (Nikon Z, Canon R/M, Fuji X, Sony E) adapter from Borg, that allows you to screw a 52mm or 2" filter inside of it. It's a bit pricey ($200), but well made. Here's the link for anyone interested! :) 

https://astrohutech.store/product/mirrorless-camera-adapters/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/11/2019 at 15:39, Space Oddities said:

There's a DSLR lens (Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K) to mirrorless camera (Nikon Z, Canon R/M, Fuji X, Sony E) adapter from Borg, that allows you to screw a 52mm or 2" filter inside of it. It's a bit pricey ($200), but well made. Here's the link for anyone interested! :) 

https://astrohutech.store/product/mirrorless-camera-adapters/

That's great for the 2 inch case - thanks for pointing this one out. I was hoping this post would turn something up. Costs a bit more than my contraption though. My main concern is whether it allows adjustment of the back focus distance for the effect of the filter?  I've been doing some focus fine tuning and have discovered that if you do not correct for that you have to focus quite a bit short of where infinity was in the ordinary FTZ. 

Edited by UKAstroBill
Realised a possible issue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 16/11/2019 at 08:14, sharkmelley said:

That's a very informative video and an interesting solution to the problem of using filters with the Nikon Z cameras.

The approach probably works well for lenses but I think 1.25" filters will cause vignetting issues when attaching the camera to a scope.

Mark

Thanks Mark - There is some discussion of this in the video. On the Nikon 200-500 there is hard vignetting at 500 but the 1:1 crop is fine. On a dedicated telescope you would almost certainly get the same. On my scopes (an APM 107/700 and a Celestron C6 with reducer) I have 2 inch filters in line and just do not use this contraption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, UKAstroBill said:

That's great for the 2 inch case - thanks for pointing this one out. I was hoping this post would turn something up. Costs a bit more than my contraption though. My main concern is whether it allows adjustment of the back focus distance for the effect of the filter?  I've been doing some focus fine tuning and have discovered that if you do not correct for that you have to focus quite a bit short of where infinity was in the ordinary FTZ. 

Sadly, no. It's some kind of bayonet mount, you can't really adjust the distance. At least on mine!

Also, the filter is placed upside down (so the front of the filter faces the sensor). I'm not sure it makes a difference though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not sure if direction matters! For a filter where it is the body of the material that does the job it can’t matter. I’ve been a bit anxious about whether a more complex layered design would be sensitive to it. Both the contraption in the video and my 2 inch prototype have the filter “right” way up but for the 1.25 case that was more to do with moving the filter away from the lens to kill the vignetting as much as possible. I’m more concerned about getting the right Backfocus though. A couple of days ago I spent some time calibrating the infinity focus on my gadget to various or no filters. The device seems to be a bit wider than the manufacturer data suggests and it was calibrating to close to FTZ infinity focus with a 0.8 mm spacer, and 1.4mm nailed it for the Optolong L enhance, with the Baader Halpha wanting a tiny bit more, though I left it at 1.4. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/11/2019 at 08:22, Space Oddities said:

Sadly, no. It's some kind of bayonet mount, you can't really adjust the distance. At least on mine!

Also, the filter is placed upside down (so the front of the filter faces the sensor). I'm not sure it makes a difference though?

Space Oddities: I think it would be sensible for me to compare the Borg device to my 2inch prototype when I get to the next stage. I’ve emailed AstroHutech to ask them some questions especially about its optical length. Eg is the fixed length the same as the FTZ or is it calibrated at eg around 2mm filters with a larger optical length. Can you tell me what lenses you Use it with and what the image quality is like edge to edge? 
 

When I first built the 1.25 gadget I calibrated it to the FTZ by matching infinity focus without filters. When I put an Optolong l enhancer or Baader Halpha in the image quality was good edge to edge on the Nikon 200-500 but poor on wide angles. I mean that if you focused in the middle the edges were fine on telephoto but way off for wide angle. Adjusting the spacer up to allow for the filter made a big improvement for the wide angles, especially UWA zone. So I’m curious how well you find a fixed length part works at various focal lengths. If you have time! I’ll probably buy it anyway to compare once I’ve heard back from them.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great description and video.

Immediately made me grab my Panasonic Lumix (4/3rds chip) GX80. This has interchangeable lenses and I have a Nikon to Lumix 4/3rds adapter which at a quick glance looks like I too can insert 1.25" filters into... One of the exposed threads inside the adapter eyeba;lls at about 42mm - if so I can get a 42mm to 1.25" filter stepdown male to female ring. 🙏

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 27/11/2019 at 21:38, fwm891 said:

Great description and video.

Immediately made me grab my Panasonic Lumix (4/3rds chip) GX80. This has interchangeable lenses and I have a Nikon to Lumix 4/3rds adapter which at a quick glance looks like I too can insert 1.25" filters into... One of the exposed threads inside the adapter eyeba;lls at about 42mm - if so I can get a 42mm to 1.25" filter stepdown male to female ring. 🙏

All kinds of possibilities. Just make sure that when you screw in a filter it is clear of the sensor and the end of the lens. The Geoptik has plenty of clearance to ensure this and I screw the filter assembly well in to be clear of the lens. 1.25 is plenty for a 4/3 or DX sensor. 
 

meanwhile Borg have confirmed their part is fixed length and indicated they designed it with IDAS filters in mind. I hope to get more details after Thanksgiving. Don’t know the optical length yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Borg responded with the useful detail that their filter adapter has an optical length of 31.3mm and is designed for IDAS filters, of thickness 2.5mm and refractive index 1.5168. So they have decided to calibrate well for a certain thickness, which makes a lot of sense. I’m ordering one and will try it out in comparison with the 2 inch version of FAstroTZ. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By bottletopburly
      Having upgraded from canon 1000D to Nikon D5300  how do users of the 5300 find it for Astro I will be using with APT , and how do you take flats as I can’t use Av mode as there is nothing in tools menu to choose no lens ,  do you use in manual mode  and look at histogram ? .
    • By jjosefsen
      Hi,
      I'm working with some recent data of a new(ish) camera, and my Ha data is pretty good, but the oiii has these strange artifacts around the borders.
      If I use any kind of local normalization then it pretty much ruins most of the image, as you can see below..
      First the Ha:

       
      Oiii with local normalization:

       
      oiii local normalization map, see how it fits with the artifacts:

       
      Oiii without any local normalization:

       
      These edge artifacts, could they be related to a bad filter or is it a processing artifact, has anyone seen anything similar?
       
      I am using Astro Pixel Processor for calibration and stacking.. Im kind of stumped on this one, and I am going to yank out the Oiii filter this weekend to have a looksie.
    • By Kcks Regulus Star
      On the 2nd of July I closed my curtains one night before I went to bed but, before they were shut I noticed a strange multicoloured light flickering low in the sky in the northern celestial hemisphere. I Thought to myself if that is a star it looks amazing. The next night (3rd of July) I decided to take another look at this multicoloured light which was still there, Only this time I used my binoculars, I was seeing blues, greens & reds. We have all seen stars by looking up into the sky but, I have never seen a star create multi colours before. It makes you feel excited inside and you think that no one else can see this until you tell them and share the same experience together. I believe I was looking at the Capella Star which is the brightest star in the constellation Auriga and your not kidding it is bright. I cant wait to have another look tonight to see if the multi colours are still there. I would like to have taken at picture of it but I am not setup to do that just yet as I am very new to star gazing. I wish someone here can confirm what I saw and to post a picture of it would be awesome. 
      Nikon Prostaff 3s 8 x 42
    • By Anne S
      Following a filter size upgrade I have an Astronomik LRGB set of filters, 1 1/4 inch. Probably around 12 years old. Kept in a filterwheel when in use but they have also been stored for a couple of years in their original box when I acquired some Baader ones to match my Baader narrowband filters. No scratches or coating issues. I have tried to show this in the images attached. 
      Looking for £80 posted given their age. 
      Anne



    • By Serg10
      I joined the forum to learn more about risks and success of filter removal for UV and IR photography.

      Back in 2011, one of the group's members, was trying to do just that:

      Unfortunately Stephen hasn't been active in the group since 2014, but the filter removal appears to have gone well (at least the S3 wasn't killed in the process).
      I have the same exact camera and I'm looking forward to try the same exact procedure. Does anyone has any tips on how to do this successfully/safely?

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.