Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

happy-kat

Members
  • Posts

    13,778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

7,028 Excellent

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Sussex

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Interesting list of updates on the synscan pro update just released, I've installed it and just need the sky to clear
  2. planets are tiny you may not need a flattener if you were using a tmount with a tring to your dslr then you could insert the tmount into a barlow or screw it to a shorty barlow then put dslr with barlow into focuser on telescope i think could look at this https://www.astropix.com/html/equipment/canon_one_to_one_pixel_resolution.html
  3. M82 has worked particularly well. For reduced trailing and rotation in the northern hemisphere aiming E or W ideally lower altitudes will help eek out the exposure time you may find you can use
  4. This is in the list of ioptron devices in skysafari 7 plus on this android device
  5. I haven't had a useable clear night sky for a while and it's the lyrids now
  6. Welcome Liking at sky watcher for example keeping in budget of the suggestion you gave there's the skymax 127 or 102 in a flavour of mount options. Depends what's key to you like portability, goto, ease or weight etc.
  7. have you tried sharpcap sharpsolve and the .25 database
  8. (When viewing the site using the simple theme on a mobile all the review text is white) Lovely to see images as well in your review, where they afocal images? It's a great setup I like how the mount is versatile offering both altaz or Equatorial with the further option of adding a motor for in EQ use.
  9. It's not looking optimistic with the Moon and clouds for me I'd have to hope for a fireball, I'll try and have a go anyway.
  10. this is a quick process of the first file, got colour in the spiral nice
  11. Hope you get clear windows I just looked at the aurora alert and it's red now
  12. That image isn't bad, the star shapes are quite good so if that was the lens I had I'd be trying it again. If it's a mirror lens is it f8? Whilst that might be slower then F5 still useable on bright targets could also try it on bright globular clusters I get odd white cross shape stars and think it's more the camera then the lens As processing skills develop old data can be revisited and reprocesses. If you decide you don't want it, clean it and could pass it to a charity shop
  13. When fiddling with processing I prefer no refraction spikes, it's easier to make a star round if there are no spikes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.