Ibbo! Posted November 30, 2009 Share Posted November 30, 2009 R2D2 has landed well thats what its been christened hereIts a 300 flex tubeI've had a couple of runs with it and it certainly pulls in the lightI'm impressed with the optics so farjust one problem, the moon is really too bright for DSO's tonight The other night I managed a few clusters and a couple of galaxiesThe first target was M45 the main stars were dazzling with a hint of nebulosity(moon & street lamp)I flitted around in Auriga mopping up 36,37 & 38 then dropped into Gemini but too close the the street lamp for 35I then zipped to 31 which again was washed out by the moon but easily picked up 32 and 110 with a bit of structure in the armsby this time it was late enough to turn off the street lamp and the moon was starting to dip to the west behind next doors garageso what did I try42 of course and wow with the 16mm nirvana it stretched through the fieldI spent at least an hour trying each of the Nirvanas each giving splendid viewsI counted 6 stars in the trap with the 4mmnow over to 35 one of my favsI had a tweak of the collimation then went over to Mars the polar cap leapt out and i saw some surface details in the 7mm swapped over to the 4mm found a star tweaked again went back to mars and decided it was a bit too much magHad a break then went back out at 3-30 had another go at mars this time with the 4mmTo end the night I popped over into leo and grabbed ngc2903 the core showing well with a hint of the spiral armsSteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjulian Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Really nice looking scope Steve! When you say M31 was washed out by the moon, but you could see M110, do you mean M33 was washed out? I haven't stayed up late enough for Mars yet, certainly sounds like a nice planet to view. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibbo! Posted December 1, 2009 Author Share Posted December 1, 2009 I did not try m33 too low110 also known as ngc205 one of the companions of m31To be honest I find mars hard work as you need time and practice to get good resultsat least this time round its got some elevation for us northernersSteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Steve you mean M110 aka Ngc205.Anyway lovely report you must have been freezing staying out all night.Fantastic scope and you have similar eyepieces to me as I have the WO variety. But I agree the 16mm is one awesome eyepiece.Have yet to view Mars this year in fact haven't viewed it with the 16" yet. You seem a little negative about viewing Mars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Nice report Steve, a really good read. Your description of NGC2903 is excellent, i can really imagine it.You are right, Mars demands time and patience for decent results. I'm unfortunate in that my skies are poo and DSO's are non starters most nights but on the up side it means i can devote all my time to the planets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibbo! Posted December 1, 2009 Author Share Posted December 1, 2009 Steve you mean M110 aka Ngc205.Anyway lovely report you must have been freezing staying out all night.Fantastic scope and you have similar eyepieces to me as I have the WO variety. But I agree the 16mm is one awesome eyepiece.Have yet to view Mars this year in fact haven't viewed it with the 16" yet. You seem a little negative about viewing Mars.Thanks Mike now changed Mars is fine if you put the time inI have spent literally hours and hours observing it and drawing it in the past (wish I could find the drawings)It is worth the effort esp with your 16" (collimation is the key oh and seeing)I was surprised the cold was not too bad last nightI even tried sketching the Christmas tree clusterSteve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamjulian Posted December 1, 2009 Share Posted December 1, 2009 Ah, sorry Steve, I thought you had got M31 and M33 muddled. I've not heard of M31 being too washed out to view yet M110 being visible. I guess you mean most of the detail was washed out rather than not being able to see it at all. Ignore me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibbo! Posted December 1, 2009 Author Share Posted December 1, 2009 I guess you mean most of the detail was washed out rather than not being able to see it at all. You got itmy poor description does not help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.