Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

undecided on which one


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I have the 10" solid tube from Skywatcher. If I'd gone for the 12" then I might've gone for flextube because of portability, though it would have been quite a bit heavier. But the 10" is only about four feet long, not a problem to carry around through doors etc at all, and will hopefully easily fit in the car as well, though I haven't tried that out yet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, when I had to decide, it was going to be 10" solid or 12" flextube. Solid in the 10" because of the advantages of not having to get a shroud and the fact that it would be portable anyway. Flextube in the 12" because the 12" solid is a pretty big beast to cart around.

That made the price difference quite a lot, around £400 for the 10" and £700+ for the 12". I took lots of advice, including on here, and a long chat with Steve at FLO, about whether the difference in aperture was worth it. Came to the conclusion that it wasn't, as the difference in appearance of DSO's would be quite subtle, and from my light polluted skies, probably not very noticeable at all. On the other hand, if you can regularly observe from a dark sky site, then you might think about what that extra £300 would give you. But I think you'll get a great scope whichever you go for ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to pitch in here. I have the 12" flextube and it's a fantastic telescope, but I have to warn it is also a very big and heavy telescope. I got a bit of a shock when it first arrived as I had only seen a 10" before and then only briefly! I am currently nursing a sore back, which I think is to do with struggling to lift the telescope in it's cardboard box (which I keep it in to prevent the spiders in my garage taking up residence in the tube). Lots of good advice above. I usually use a shroud with my scope, partly to prevent dew on the secondary and partly because I'm scared of accidentally dropping something in the 'bin'. The shroud adds to set up time and the more open tube probably isn't as good for dust control. Of course the flextube design allows me to cram a 12" scope in my 9 year old Fiesta and observe from Dartmoor - not bad at all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the same optical design as the dobsonians you have been looking at - actually a dobsonian is just a newtonian optical tube on a simple mount which was invented by a guy called John Dobson - hence "dobsonian".

Obviously the C8-NGT is on a GOTO equatorial mount. Recently you could buy the same scope on a non-GOTO version of the same mount for around £260 - so you are paying around £500 for the GOTO facility which seems a lot to me but then I'm not bothered about having GOTO.

John

PS: Telescope Planet don't have a great reputation - have a look around SGL for some reports on their service ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cheers John . Goto is more for the children , hopefully it keeps them more intrested . Have heard/read all about T P

should of actually said a newton of this size , have had smaller ones yrs ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.