Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Where to start with planetary imaging...


Beardy Bob

Recommended Posts

Hi folks. I have a C80ED, a 350d and a pretty good quality point-and-click fuji camera.

Up to now I have been using the 350d at prime focus for images of large nebulae using a 2" extension tube and adapter, but with nights so light and jupiter quite prominent at the moment I was hoping that I could (relatively) inexpensively adapt my system so I can also tinker with taking some planetary images.

So my questions are these:

1. Which method is best to try and take planetary (i.e. jupiter and saturn really) images; prime focus using the 350d with barlows, eyepiece projection using the point-and-click camera, or some other method?

2. What kit would I need/would you recommend and how would it all hook up?

Hope someone can help. I've tried to include everything!

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would personally try the webcam route.

Get a cheapy 2nd hand Phillips, Nose piece adapter and an IR filter (you wont need that straight away)

You will need a laptop though....

Your scope will be fine :)

Cheers

Jon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bob

I dont think your set up is at all ideal for what

you have in mind.

The minimum you should have for planetary

imaging should be at least 100mm refractor

with a high f ratio (f7 upwards) some barlows

and critically some kind of webcam.

If you wish to use your current set up then

you should get a maginified image in your eyepice as seeing

allows and hold the camera to the eypiece to take the

shot.

Your disc images however will be small and grainy.

The webcam option is the way forward.

Ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Ed. I'm well aware that my setup is far from ideal. I just wanted a cheap 'mod' to play with planetary imaging while I wait for long, dark nights again for my faint, wide field stuff to come back around. Thing is, I need details - how to attach what to what.

Jon, you reckon avi recorded onto a laptop is better than 'stills' do you? Interesting. Is that through eyepiece projection? What kit would I need for that? And surely I would also need to magnify the image using a barlow first wouldn't I?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jon, you reckon avi recorded onto a laptop is better than 'stills' do you? Interesting. Is that through eyepiece projection? What kit would I need for that? And surely I would also need to magnify the image using a barlow first wouldn't I?

I use a scope the same as yours for planetary imaging using a webcam. Yes you will need a barlow.

SGL primer here http://stargazerslounge.com/primers-tutorials/40665-primer-planetary-imaging-toucam.html :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brill. Thanks Jon. I reckon I'll go down the barlow route then. Probably a 4x based on that primer. (I also see you have a 4x televue in your itinerary. Is that for imaging?)

I reckon I can use the nosepiece currently on my 350d (or a smaller, 1.25" version) to hook it up to a barlow. Then I'll have pretty much exactly the same setup I use for my wide-field stuff but with a honking great barlow to magnify the whole shabang. Then I'm just using a 350d instead of the toucam. I can't see that would make too much difference as long as it takes video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bob. I agree with all the advice about webcams, its certainly all true and of course the bigger aperture, the higher the resolution (and generally the higher magnification given a higher corresponding focal length of instrument).

But, you can still get good images by (I imagine this has been talked about on the tutorials listed above - sorry, haven't looked) taking mutltiple images with your canon (as many as humanly possible, at the highest resolution/quality of the camera). This will still build up your signal to noise ratio and improve the quality over one individual frame (Try and take all the images within about say, 2 minutes as the object you are imaging is rotating after all!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oops - sorry, forgot to mention - run all the images through Registax (downloadable for free - you can google for it). It wouldn't surprise me if DeepSkyStacker worked as well for DSLR planetary frame stacking although i've never tried it...!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.