Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M31 with askar 103apo and 0.6x reducer


Vash

Recommended Posts

M31 taken with the askar 103 apo and 0.6x reducer using a canon 800d. 

A total of almost 9 hours using 2 min subs. 

 

Quite pleased with how this one came out (click for full resolution). 

 

 

m31 9h f4 420mm.jpeg

Edited by Vash
  • Like 29
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks both! 

 

I cropped a tiny bit to remove stacking/dither artifacts at the very edges but otherwise it is almost the full aps-c sensor size. 

I did use starnet to remove the stars and stretched them separately from the galaxy but both stars and galaxy only got a normal histagram stretch (I haven't spent the time to understand generalized hyperbolic stretch yet!) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/11/2023 at 11:12, Vash said:

M31 taken with the askar 103 apo and 0.6x reducer using a canon 800d. 

A total of almost 9 hours using 2 min subs. 

 

Quite pleased with how this one came out (click for full resolution). 

 

 

m31 9h f4 420mm.jpeg

Beautiful Image…👍🏻

can I ask if this had been cropped at all, (actually I can see that it has been cropped a bit) and if so can you post the full uncropped image so we can see full corner stars using this reducer…

Edited by Stuart1971
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Vash said:

Thanks Stuart, the crop was quite minimal. Below is an un cropped version. 

M31nocrop.thumb.jpeg.c71e84998584e89eea05386500472df5.jpeg

Those corner stars are excellent, especially with using a 0.6x reducer too,  very impressed, much  better than the Esprit 100 that I have, and I have a good one….supposedly..👍🏻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Vash said:

I took a bit of a jump getting this scope before there were many reviews but I have been really impressed, especially given the versitiliy and price

 

I was on the verge but was sidetracked by a good doublet which came up. Still might get a 103 or 120 though if the doublet doesn't prove it's worth photographically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.