Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

OSC NB filter


Recommended Posts

I never thought I'd say this, as someone who started off using DSLR then OSC but;

If you want the best value for money and halo free narrowband imaging then I think the best you can do is search around and get yourself a mono setup.

"He must be mad!" I hear you say, but no. If you search the second hand market you can get yourself a good CCD mono camera, filter wheel and SHO filter set cheaper than some of these top of the range Ha/Oiii & Oiii/Sii duo-band filter sets.

I managed to put together an Atik 428EX camera, Atik EFW2, Baader 7-8.5nm SHO and LRGB filter sets for just short of £800.  Sure, the sensor is smaller than my ASI294MC but I can create real SHO images or board-band for galaxies, and it doesn't really take any longer (apart from taking the flats ;) ).

Just an alternative which may be worth considering. :D

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Anthonyexmouth said:

What's the best bang for buck dual NB filter at the moment? preferably one with minimal halo issues. 

Difficult one this, I started off with the Optolong L-eXtreme and was mostly pleased with it apart from the halo issue which seemed particular bad so I ended buying the Antlia ALP-T "Gold" dual band 5nm filter and have not looked back, this was before the new L-Ultimate came out though. I am not sure that there is a cheap option if halo's are an issue for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gary Clayton said:

Difficult one this, I started off with the Optolong L-eXtreme and was mostly pleased with it apart from the halo issue which seemed particular bad so I ended buying the Antlia ALP-T "Gold" dual band 5nm filter and have not looked back, this was before the new L-Ultimate came out though. I am not sure that there is a cheap option if halo's are an issue for you.

The Antlia would be my choice if I was brave enough to spend that much on 2" of glass. I guess I really should. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can be sure that the IDAS NBZ meets specification. Great filter for lower LP areas, I use it in Bortle 4-7

The Antlia is nominally tighter, I also have that, it's a good filter

I've never bought an Optolong Filter, because of reported halos

 

This test by Jim is useful

https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/797739-idas-filter-comparison-test-report/

Edited by 900SL
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I just bought an Askar Duo-band filter, not the colour magic magic one, the cheaper £199 one. Wondering if anyone has any feedback on this and also anyone created a filter profile for Pixinsight SPCC for this filter? 

Wondering if I made a mistake getting the cheaper one and should maybe return it and splash out for a colour magic one or the Antlia filter. 

https://www.firstlightoptics.com/askar-filters/askar-duo-band-narrowband-filter.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original Askar Duo-Band filter does suffer from the odd halo on stars, same as the L-eXtreme. It's a good filter for OSC NB imaging and does pull out good Ha & Oiii data. I have one and used it on a few of my images. The halo's can be cleaned up in post-processing with the CloneStamp after the stars have been removed. ;)

I haven't done a profile for SPCC but use the White Reference "Photon Flux", 656.0nm for the Red channel and 500.7nm for the Green & Blue channels for an HOO image, all with a band width of 7nm.

See these threads for details and images:

 

Edited by Budgie1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Budgie1 said:

The original Askar Duo-Band filter does suffer from the odd halo on stars, same as the L-eXtreme. It's a good filter for OSC NB imaging and does pull out good Ha & Oiii data. I have one and used it on a few of my images. The halo's can be cleaned up in post-processing with the CloneStamp after the stars have been removed. ;)

I haven't done a profile for SPCC but use the White Reference "Photon Flux", 656.0nm for the Red channel and 500.7nm for the Green & Blue channels for an HOO image, all with a band width of 7nm.

See these threads for details and images:

 

I did give it a go last night on the elephant truck and seems ok. Although session ruined with me auto focus issues. Are those options you mentioned in the spcc filter menu? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have anything on the filter itself but the case & out box both have it on there.

I should add that I got my Duo-Band just after they first came out, back in 2021, so they may have changed the packaging since then.

IMG_1452.JPG.26db80249a83a95c68509009dc453ca5.JPG

IMG_1454.JPG.8e6ea4842e7913710ff4c013a1b193ed.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't want to hijack or anything, I'm really new to Imaging and I have a couple of the Optolong filters, but not done may targets yet.

I'm using the OSC 2600MC camera and I wanted to know - how do you know what filter to use on what target? For example I just put up my first post yesterday or the first image I have taken in the hobby, in which I used the L-Ultimate filter https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/411348-first-ever-dso-imaged-and-processed-ic1805-heart-nebula/

Everything is red with some yellow - but I saw a similar post where the same target ad blue's and green's in it as well - is that because I'm limited with my filter, or just the editor playing with colour schemes in post processing? I wondered if there was some kind of database online, or some way of looking at what type light a target object emits - so I can match that with the right kind of filter (if any) to make sure I don't block out stuff I would want to capture. 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Bargy said:

Don't want to hijack or anything, I'm really new to Imaging and I have a couple of the Optolong filters, but not done may targets yet.

I'm using the OSC 2600MC camera and I wanted to know - how do you know what filter to use on what target? For example I just put up my first post yesterday or the first image I have taken in the hobby, in which I used the L-Ultimate filter https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/411348-first-ever-dso-imaged-and-processed-ic1805-heart-nebula/

Everything is red with some yellow - but I saw a similar post where the same target ad blue's and green's in it as well - is that because I'm limited with my filter, or just the editor playing with colour schemes in post processing? I wondered if there was some kind of database online, or some way of looking at what type light a target object emits - so I can match that with the right kind of filter (if any) to make sure I don't block out stuff I would want to capture. 

Thanks

You're probably seeing a narrowband image or someone has processed a osc image as a Hubble or Fornax image. Check out paulyman astro on YouTube for some good osc processing tips. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Bargy said:

Don't want to hijack or anything, I'm really new to Imaging and I have a couple of the Optolong filters, but not done may targets yet.

I'm using the OSC 2600MC camera and I wanted to know - how do you know what filter to use on what target? For example I just put up my first post yesterday or the first image I have taken in the hobby, in which I used the L-Ultimate filter https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/411348-first-ever-dso-imaged-and-processed-ic1805-heart-nebula/

Everything is red with some yellow - but I saw a similar post where the same target ad blue's and green's in it as well - is that because I'm limited with my filter, or just the editor playing with colour schemes in post processing? I wondered if there was some kind of database online, or some way of looking at what type light a target object emits - so I can match that with the right kind of filter (if any) to make sure I don't block out stuff I would want to capture. 

Thanks

So, the basic rule of thumb when using duo-band filters with OSC cameras is; Only use the duo-band filter (narrowband) on targets which mainly consist of Hydrogen Alpha & Oxygen III gases, so you're talking about Emission Nebula, such as the Heart (which you've imaged nicely :thumbsup:) California Nebula, North American Nebula .....etc. These filters are also good with Planetary Nebula like the Dumbbell and Super Nova remnants such as the Veil Nebula.

Where you don't want to use these filters is the like of star clusters, galaxies and Reflection Nebula, like the Iris, Ghost & the nebulosity around Pleiades because most of the light from these targets will be blocked by the filter. So, for these targets the best filter is a good UV/IR block filter, unless you have bad light pollution, in which case a suitable LP filter may be of use.

As for the different colours, as Anthony has said, this could be an image processed using the Hubble Pallet, as processing technique used initially for the Hubble Space Telescope images but now used for narrowband imaging. In narrowband imaging you use a mono camera with Ha, Oiii & Sii filters and when you process the image they are stacked using Sii for the Red channel, Ha for Green and Oii for Blue. This is called an SHO image.

You can use a similar technique with colour images and there are a few tutorials around for this, depending on the software you use.

Here's an SHO image I did of the centre of the Heart Nebula with my mono camera.

IC1805-HeartNebula-11h0m-13122022-HaSHO.thumb.png.4f1de847beddbb54004136b3947d6452.png

I hope that helps a little. :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.