Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b89429c566825f6ab32bcafbada449c9.jpg

M56


Recommended Posts

I freely admit to not being entirely certain what I'm doing yet, but I'm starting to get passable images with my new setup

11 subs of 120 seconds using a ZWO ASI585 and William Optics ZS73 APO with flattener on an AZ-EQ5, stacked in ASTAP and stretched in GIMP

Only 11 subs as the battery was losing power and the subs ended up with star trails in them after these

M 56, 2023-06-04, 11x120L, EQMod Mount, (CV), ZWO ASI585MC_average_stacked.jpg

Edited by Mognet
Processing details
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely a good start - keep going. Just out of interest, did you use an IR cut filter? The 585 is quite sensitive to IR and your stars look at bit bloated. Maybe high cloud or something else - just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Clarkey said:

Definitely a good start - keep going. Just out of interest, did you use an IR cut filter? The 585 is quite sensitive to IR and your stars look at bit bloated. Maybe high cloud or something else - just a thought.

Thanks. I haven't used a filter. I suspect either my focus was a little off, or I'm stretching the data too hard as the exposures may not be long enough. I've attached one of the subs in FITS format, and the stars look fairly sharply defined in that

M_56_Light_001.fits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you would see quite a bit of difference with the filter. My guess is that there is some bloat which would be greatly reduced with a UV/IR cut filter. Well worth the £20 outlay for a basic 1.25".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Mognet said:

Thanks. I haven't used a filter. I suspect either my focus was a little off, or I'm stretching the data too hard as the exposures may not be long enough. I've attached one of the subs in FITS format, and the stars look fairly sharply defined in that

Thats a great start...As others have said try adding a UV/IR cut filter and see if you can reduce the FWHM on the stars to improve focus. The aim is to get lowest FWHM ie. sharpest stars. 🙂 Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

After waiting for two months for a clear and dark sky I've finally had chance to try with a UV/IR cut filter. Processing isn't great, and I was having a bit of an issue with star trailing, but the results are defintely improved. Just got to sort the other niggles now.

20230819-M56-dss-1.thumb.jpg.57654ed73df9de5e3b6a3c2b24db7881.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.