Jump to content

Narrowband

AstroMuni

Members
  • Posts

    1,493
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by AstroMuni

  1. Louise, if you want the luxury of sitting in your room and imaging on a low budget then the RPi is the way to go. You can purchase an RPi for less than £100 and get either a free build such as Astroarch (astroberry has stopped providing updates hence didnt recommend) or Stellarmate ($59) which comes with an app to run on your phone or tablet. If you dont have a computer I would suggest getting a tablet and connecting to the RPi with browser. Its possible to do this with a phone but I find the screen is too small. I use the HEQ5 pro with the RPI and have been using this combo for a few years now.
  2. And so does Ekos. In fact it can work with its own Platesolver or use external ones like ASTAP
  3. My understanding based on how it works in Ekos is that the software maintains a mount model which takes into account the accuracy of PA etc. This is updated every time you platesolve and allows it to calculate the slew needed to accurately reach an object. The software has options to save the model on your computer so its reused the next time (this would work only if you havent moved the scope & mount, eg.in an observatory). I dont know if the model is saved onto the mount itself as different mounts may or may not have that capability to retain this info. Here is the explanation from Stellarmate page: Each time an image is plate-solved successfully, a Sync point is appended to the Mount Model. With more points added, the mount GOTO accuracy would improve especially if there are sync points close to the GOTO target.
  4. In that case I was way behind you as I had started the astronomy journey in earnest around 6 months prior and then got straight into AP.
  5. I know exactly how you feel as I was in same boat during covid when I started my journey into AP 🙂
  6. If you are plate solving you dont need to do the 2/3 star alignment. With every platesolve, the mount model will be updated to make it more accurate.
  7. The ZWO graphs are here https://www.firstlightoptics.com/zwo-cameras/zwo-asi-2600mc-pro-usb-30-cooled-colour-camera.html?_gl=1*1550dz8*_up*MQ..*_ga*NTI0ODU4NTE5LjE3MTE0NjU4NTQ.*_ga_F6VGWQ0MW9*MTcxMTQ2NTg1My4xLjAuMTcxMTQ2NTg1My4wLjAuMA.. As the 2600 also uses the Sony IMX571 its characteristics will be same as Altair's version. The main differences in camera would be primarily in the cooling circuitry and any USB controllers. Here is a discussion on the various brands that use the same chip (albeit its talking about the mono version) https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/866522-what-is-the-real-difference-between-all-the-imx571-cameras/
  8. If you are getting crisp views of features on the moon and stars are pinpoint then I wouldnt worry about collimation. I had a Celestron 130 and yours looks similar, so dont expect crisp views of planets. The edges will be fuzzy - partly because of the the atmospheric effects and the partly due to steadiness of your scope. The focuser is also not the best so its hard to get exact focus.
  9. One way is to look at the graphs provided by the vendor. As the ZWO ASI2600mc is using same IMX571 chip the graphs for this would be similar to the Altair version. These show a significant drop in read noise at Gain 100 when HCG kicks in.
  10. I live in North Hampshire, so a member of the Basingstoke society. We have a few members who also attend the HAG meetings, but I dont think I know anyone from Solent group.
  11. Remind me, whats your equipment at the moment? Looking at your images they are certainly out of focus but at first glance this seems quite similar across the frame.
  12. Check out GraXpert AI too. Sometimes it does a better job at extracting the background as compared to RBF in Siril (btw, RBF is from GraXpert and incorporated into Siril)
  13. Its not just the PA accuracy that influences the image quality. There are other factors like mount stability, guiding, backlash etc.that affect your image. At the end of the day, its what level of quality is good enough (acceptable) for you.
  14. Have you set & saved your coords under the Geographic... option? Once thats done it should grab the right time from your wifi.
  15. Its a good distro and is slowly but surely becoming more main stream. I tried it when it was in its first few releases and faced issues where the updates would break the OS and it had to be reinstalled from scratch. So as compared to Astroberry or Stellarmate its still in its infant stages but fast getting there all thanks to its maintainer...Hats off for his efforts.
  16. You might just get away without one. I need a CC for the ASI533 with 130/650 scope.
  17. As a Mac user you could also try Kstars/Ekos which runs natively on Mac & Linux based devices. This software also provides the tool for PA.
  18. Anyone who can use a phone to respond in forums is still young... ha ha After doing a 2/3 star alignment the synscan app is trying to tell you how far off you are from a perfect polar alignment. If you find you are way off then start the process again (without using the hand controller). I wouldnt worry too much about it if you have visually checked the location of polaris in the clockface. I never get perfect PA and can still manage to get decent images without star trails. So dont worry.
  19. This post may help https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/639135-synscan-goto-alignment-precision/
  20. @TiffsAndAstro The advice above makes perfect sense to me, but as its causing some confusion in your mind lets keep it simple & try this again from scratch.... - To align your polarscope reticle try this https://www.myastroscience.com/polarscopecalibration - Do NOT use your handcontroller for these steps - Position your mount so that Polaris is visible in your polarscope - Rotate the axis until the clockface is right side up (i.e 12 or 0 is up and 6 is down). Personally I am not fussed about the numbers themselves as long as it resembles a clock (eg. 3 maybe in 6 o'clock position) - Use the al-az knobs, latitude bolt until polaris is in the right position in the clock face. You can get the location from any polar alignment app on your phone - You can now start using the hand controller to do star alignment etc. DO NOT move your mount or adjust any knobs after doing star alignment! Hope this makes sense 🙂
  21. NINA (for windows users) and Ekos (for Mac/Linux/RPi users) Ekos certainly does this.
  22. Looks like you have a similar reticle to mine. If you look closely you will notice 3 circles in the clock face. The years tell you which of the circles to use for aligning Polaris. At the moment its the central ring. I wouldnt worry too much about parallax error. I have been doing polar alignment using the polarscope and my images havent been badly affected using exposure times between 30-60s without guiding. Good luck.
  23. Also play around with this tool https://astronomy.tools/calculators/ccd_suitability to see which camera is best suited for your scope. Assuming you have already purchased this scope, the FL is 750mm so the only variable factor is pixel size. A lot of modern cameras have pixel sizes between 2.9-3.75um and you can see from the calculator that getting a camera with 2.9um is more favourable as you can also bin 2x2. Ultimately I think its your budget that will help decide which camera to go for. I started my AP journey with an ASI224mc.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.