Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Specific noise from DSLR


Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, UCzerw said:

Gude scope 60/240mm, guide cam 3,75 upix

Imaging scope 72/420 + 0,85 reducer;  camera 4,3 upix

Scale 1,3x probably 

Apt dither of 7  should give you a dither of approx 18pixels ,6 will give approx 15 pixel dither .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, UCzerw said:

"smudges" of noise.

Hi

Try a bigger dither with windsored sigma clip at e.g. 3 3. The debayer looks like it's left a grid too. Try RCD.

If you're not keen on spending time processing (I'm not!) I think you're gonna have to get an astro camera, use your Nikon or simply take more frames with the 600. Otherwise, it's easily corrected.

Cheers

image.png.9918a6c5cb9691d42a9e4f20694ce9bc_01.jpg.a7703178bdf59d903e0db13e027f6847.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, alacant said:

Hi

Try a bigger dither with windsored sigma clip at e.g. 3 3. The debayer looks like it's left a grid too. Try RCD.

If you're not keen on spending time processing (I'm not!) I think you're gonna have to get an astro camera, use your Nikon or simply take more frames with the 600. Otherwise, it's easily corrected.

Cheers

 

Thanks. I used the latest version of Siril. A few days ago it was published and I can see that the RCD is set by default.
Damn white nights. Terribly short, but now the moon is coming, it will be a bit of a rest.
I'm seriously starting to think about a cooled camera, I have to look for information that is worth choosing at the beginning.

I just wonder if this noise on the red channel is normal? Single light frame, auto stretch.

image.thumb.png.032244206db416cc01bf9d82cbe38a34.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UCzerw said:

noise on the red channel

Hi

Can't tell. Please post -links to- 

  • a single light frame
  • a single bias frame
  • master bias
  • final stack

We use mainly a -same sensor i think- 700d, but don't see the noise you illustrate. 

Cheers

Edited by alacant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UCzerw said:

Hope everything works

Yes. OK. It seems the red overpowers the other two channels. 

JTOL, it's like both the hot mirror and the moire ir filter have been removed. Is that the case?

Anyway, it'd doable, but makes processing more difficult than need be.

There is not nearly enough dither. To lose the walk with a 600d, you're gonna need at least 10px and between every frame. See @bottletopburly's calculation, here

With a refractor, an ir cut filter can often help with stuff like this, especially for full spectrum modifications.

That should make it a lot cleaner.

Just our €0.02 hands on. Maybe the theorists could throw some light on the matter too, but hey, for a camera which has 10 year old technology, it's very good. There's loadsa faint stuff showing

HTH

1-101a_01.thumb.jpg.ecddb246f32bdcc79b78eabb153fada7.jpg

 

 

Edited by alacant
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think only one filter has been removed. It is not a full spectrum mod. I received one filter as a souvenir, and the person who made the modifications thinks that there is no need to remove two filters.

But soon the Moon comes into play, and so far I'm not using filters. Besides, I might have a problem with that. SkyWatcher is smart . Their reducer does not support filters 😅

I'll try to increase the dithering. I just don't understand these calculations. If I have a 1.3x scale difference (image / guide scale). In phd2 I have dither scale set to 10. In APT I have set to 1. So that's 13 pixels. If I change dither distance to 2 in APT, I will get an offset of 26 pixels. Setting APT dither to 7 will give me over 70 pixels.
Am I counting something wrong? There is any "sweet point" how many pixels should I set for dithering?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, bottletopburly said:

Nice article here I just got my lad to do a spreadsheet based on a formula posted on Apt forum  

https://www.myastroscience.com/calculatedithering

I found it. But I have considerable gaps in knowledge. After graduation, I have to work hard on the theoretical foundations of astrophotography.
Excel show to set APT to 2

image.png.da2b592cdd5585ea3d9bd6d984a6db08.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.