Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

NGC4217


Jkulin

Recommended Posts

I have seen very few images of this subject, most seem to be with M106, I did think about taking it in portrait mode, but I rather liked the way the stars danced across the screen.

I have learnt some new techniques which have helped immensely and I am rather pleased how this has turned out.

Again, taken with my GSO/Altair 10" RC Truss, iOptron 120EC, Moravian G2-8300, Pegasus UPB, Chroma 2" Filters, more details here: -

https://www.astrobin.com/k4i9un/

Here's the capture details: -

GSO/Altair 10" RC Truss
Moravian G2-8300 Mk!!
Chroma 2" Unmounted LRGB
iOptron 120EC
Lodestar x2 Gudie Camera
QHY-M OAG with Custom adapters

Dates:April 23, 2020 ,  April 24, 2020

Frames:
Chroma Blue 2" unmounted: 21x390" -20C bin 1x1
Chroma Green 2" unmounted: 21x300" -20C bin 1x1
Chroma Luminance 2" unmounted: 24x300" -20C bin 1x1
Chroma Red 2" unmounted: 21x348" -20C bin 1x1

Integration: 8.1 hours

Darks: ~30
Flats: ~25
Bias: ~100
Avg. Moon age: 0.81 days
Avg. Moon phase: 0.97%
Bortle Dark-Sky Scale: 5.00
Mean SQM: 19.51
Temperature: 8.37

Here's the bumf as usual, although there isn't a lot around: -

NGC 4217 is an edge-on spiral galaxy which lies approximately 60 million light-years ( 18 million parsecs ) away in the constellation of Canes Venatici. It is a possible companion galaxy to M106 (also known as NGC 4258).

NGC4217_1200_signed.png.4c645ab7a8760dbdb4810ad19710a6fb.png

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, tooth_dr said:

Hi John

I first noticed this when I was imaging m106 last year. This year I made sure it was framed along with M106. It’s quite spectacular.  The colours you have in the stars is fabulous. 

Thanks Adam, you wouldn't believe how many times I reprocessed this in Pixinsight, and last night at 03:10 in the morning I said enough.

The biggest issue I have always had was noise and I really failed at that miserably and this video on YouTube, explained it so easily, hope the link helps.

I'm working on another cracker at the moment with around 15+ hours of data and hopefully will be able to put these new techniques to good use, I did try APP, but haven't really got to grips with that yet.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.