Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Best all sky cam?


tooth_dr

Recommended Posts

'Ready made' probably yes. To be honest there isnt really much of a choice...

If you are up for a bit of diy then I would go for something like an ASI178MC with a good Fujinon lens. You can get domes and heating elements easy enough but you would have to create a waterproof housing of some sort. There are some good designs around if you Google it. A 3d printer helps but it can also be done with piping or boxes. You would certainly get better image quality (and colour).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AngryDonkey said:

'Ready made' probably yes. To be honest there isnt really much of a choice...

If you are up for a bit of diy then I would go for something like an ASI178MC with a good Fujinon lens. You can get domes and heating elements easy enough but you would have to create a waterproof housing of some sort. There are some good designs around if you Google it. A 3d printer helps but it can also be done with piping or boxes. You would certainly get better image quality (and colour).

Thanks ?? I’ll look into this. Software wise - allskeye?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Yawning Angel said:

This might be worth a punt at the price : eBay

Unfortunately it’s not much use

Specs:
Camera Type: Color NTSC
Pick Up Device: 1/3"" Sony EXviewHAD CCDII*
Pic Elements: 976(H) x 582(V)
Resolution: 700TV Lines
Min Illumination: 0.1 Lux / F1.2
White Bal: Auto/preset/indoor/outdoor/fluorescent (Requires optional OSD Cable)
Lens: 5mp CS IR/F2.0/2.8mm
Dimensions: 38x38mm
Weight: 31g (with 2.8mm lens)
Voltage: DC8.5V-DC20V
Power: DC12V 70mA +/-5mA
FOV: 156 Degrees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, tooth_dr said:

Thanks ?? I’ll look into this. Software wise - allskeye?

Of course! But then I am biased ? If you go for the Oculus then AllSkEye is definitely your best bet (I originally wrote it for the Oculus although now it supports all ASCOM cameras and also natively ASI ZWO cameras).

AllSkEye is very feature rich and has lots of extras but it only runs on Windows so you would need to factor that in e.g. availability of a Windows machine, location, USB cable length limits etc. 

11 hours ago, tooth_dr said:

ASI178MC not the cooled version?

I've not tried a cooled camera for all sky images but personally I don't think the extra cost will be worth it (and you would also need to factor in having to get rid of all the heat in the housing that's being generated by the cooler). AllSkEye has a bad pixel map feature which usually manages to clean up the image of any hot pixel.

One main thing to consider is the camera / lens combination as this will determine how much of the sky you will be able to see. In terms of the camera the resolution is obviously the main consideration in terms of image quality but the sensor shape also plays a role i.e. a more square (squarer?) sensor will normally work better for all sky as the all sky image should be a circle. Most people are usually aiming for a full 180 degree image, this can for example be achieved with an ASI 178MC and a 1.4mm Fujinon lens. Personally I actually prefer not to get the full 180 degree view but am usually aiming for 150 degrees. This way a bit of the horizon is cut off but I can fill the entire rectangle of the sensor and a lot of the stray light from houses etc. it also cut down. I guess it's a matter of personal taste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, AngryDonkey said:

Of course! But then I am biased ? If you go for the Oculus then AllSkEye is definitely your best bet (I originally wrote it for the Oculus although now it supports all ASCOM cameras and also natively ASI ZWO cameras).

AllSkEye is very feature rich and has lots of extras but it only runs on Windows so you would need to factor that in e.g. availability of a Windows machine, location, USB cable length limits etc. 

I've not tried a cooled camera for all sky images but personally I don't think the extra cost will be worth it (and you would also need to factor in having to get rid of all the heat in the housing that's being generated by the cooler). AllSkEye has a bad pixel map feature which usually manages to clean up the image of any hot pixel.

One main thing to consider is the camera / lens combination as this will determine how much of the sky you will be able to see. In terms of the camera the resolution is obviously the main consideration in terms of image quality but the sensor shape also plays a role i.e. a more square (squarer?) sensor will normally work better for all sky as the all sky image should be a circle. Most people are usually aiming for a full 180 degree image, this can for example be achieved with an ASI 178MC and a 1.4mm Fujinon lens. Personally I actually prefer not to get the full 180 degree view but am usually aiming for 150 degrees. This way a bit of the horizon is cut off but I can fill the entire rectangle of the sensor and a lot of the stray light from houses etc. it also cut down. I guess it's a matter of personal taste.

Thank you! That info has been most useful. :) I read that oculus own software wasn’t great and I hadn’t realised yours works with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, tooth_dr said:

Does anyone have any sample images from the ZWO 178MC and Fujinon lens?

You can have a look at these two live cameras:

https://www.astropage.nl/weather/

https://weather.orionranchobservatory.com/allskyimages/OROAllSkEyeLatest.jpg

4 hours ago, tooth_dr said:

Is there an off the shelf enclosure available?

I don't know of any. I'm not 100% sure but I think Alcor System do all sky cameras that might have ASI ZWO cameras in them (certainly CMOS). They are 2000 USD and upwards though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AngryDonkey said:

You can have a look at these two live cameras:

https://www.astropage.nl/weather/

https://weather.orionranchobservatory.com/allskyimages/OROAllSkEyeLatest.jpg

I don't know of any. I'm not 100% sure but I think Alcor System do all sky cameras that might have ASI ZWO cameras in them (certainly CMOS). They are 2000 USD and upwards though.

Thank-you yet again!  I'm tempted by the Oculus model, purely on the simplicity to get it running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.