Jupiter - Same but Different

[Stub Mandrel]

Four sets of data for Jupiter, each one is a series of essentially identical runs using my ASI120MC, ADC, x3 barlow and 150PL. All processed the same, with the various runs compiled using WinJUPOS and resharpened. The differences are how many video runs went into each image, the seeing at the time and that the second and fourth images are with Jupiter slightly higher in the sky. One image is clearly better than the others, despite less data :-)

Three runs, night 1:

Three runs, night 1:

Five runs, night 2 (two worst runs omitted):

Twelve runs, night 2 (two worst runs omitted):

 

[MarsG76]

Just goes to show that jupiter processing should be done using various methods before deciding on the final.

 

[orion25]

Interesting results, Neil. I like the image quality of the second image best (plus the moon and shadow)  But I like the features visible on images three and four.

Reggie