Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Exposer Times


Recommended Posts

Is there any info about what exposer times should be used with the magnitude of the subject you are shooting.
In theory all you need to know is that that photon flux from a Mag. 0 star at the top of the Earth's atmosphere is 8.79 x 10**9 per m² per second and atmospheric extinction is 0.28 Mag per air-mass.

All the rest is just arithmetic :grin:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd think there are just too many variables to make that feasible. Perhaps the best guide to start with is to use a capture program that can show you the histogram for the captured image and set the exposure time to get the histogram reasonably full whilst avoiding trailing in the image. Of course that doesn't always work because on some targets such as the Andromeda Galaxy or the Orion Nebula you'll get some parts blowing out way before others have sufficient exposure. But it's a start.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't possible to use charts from theory. F ratio, sampling rate, chip sensitivity, chip noise (particularly thermal in uncooled cameras), transparency, light pollution, polar alignment and tracking precision all have their influences.

Expose for as long as your sky or one of the other limiting factors allows. You may end up saturating bright galaxy cores and stars. If this is so take some short subs to blend in with the long ones in processing. In reality this is rarely needed if you get the hang of doing special soft stretches for the brightest parts of an image and layering them in.

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be trying for Galaxies, star clusters and nebuler.

my equpment is HEQ5 pro, Opticstar AR 90 f6. QHY8L CCD Colour. Lights will be in RAW format.

I tried for M15 and Andromeda over the weekend but did not get much detail,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could probably go for exposures of several minutes on M31 if you can guide accurately enough. If you're not guiding then the accuracy of your polar alignment will perhaps be the limiting factor in length of exposure. I'd expect M15 to show some reasonable detail with shorter exposures, though you'd probably still need to stretch the histogram a fair bit to bring out the detail.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.