Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

Comparison of JPEG and RAW White Light Solar Images


JamesF

Recommended Posts

These two images were taken from the same imaging run, 60 of 120 images stacked, 1/1000th @ ISO100. The RAW files were processed with PIPP, but I couldn't get Registax to process the TIFF files produced by PIPP from the JPEGs so I used the camera JPEG files directly. Both stacked in Registax v6 and finished off in Photoshop. I don't think I need to hide which is which. It's blindingly obvious...

First, the image from the RAW files:

sun-2012-09-13-1000-cr2-small.png

and from the JPEGs:

sun-2012-09-13-1000-jpeg-small.png

And crops of the sunspots from the full size images:

spots-2012-09-13-1000-cr2-processed..png

spots-2012-09-13-1000-jpeg-processed.png

I might try again, converting the JPEG to monochrome first, but I don't think there's any real comparison. The reduction in size of the JPEG in the full solar image clearly does it a lot of favours.

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.