Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

"So you believe is astronomy do you?"


palebluedot

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
For fun, let's take the title of thread literally, "So you believe is astronomy do you?"

Now, focus on a particular aspect of astronomy, Newton's law of gravity. Pretend that Newton's law of gravity is true (actually, it isn't). What would it take to prove Newton's law of gravity true, so that no belief is required?

Full disclosure: I'm a physicist.

Proving a scientific law true is impossible, because the truth is unknowable. All we can do is propose theories that explain the phenomena observed, and test these theories. Newton's law of gravity is flawed, as Newton himself knew, because it cannot explain the precession of the orbit of Mercury. Einstein's general relativity can explain it. For a long time, Newton's law of gravity was the best available. Currently it is Einstein's law. Given dark matter and dark energy (reminds me of the "ether"), we might be in for a paradigm shift sooner or later.

There is no need for belief in science, unless in that everyday sense of "I believe the evidence is most in favour of theory X, not Y"

Doubt is actually what keeps science ticking, not belief. Sometimes scientists forget that. They are only human, after all :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, homeopathy! I once wrote a little treatise on that in Annals of Improbable Research. A preprint can be found here: http://www.cs.rug.nl/~michael/qthair.pdf

It has been translated to Spanish and Czech, and has even be cited in the scientific literature. Must be true then :)

Michael that is an astounding and profound piece of work! I am keeping my own wave-function in a sealed and locked box from now on, ne'er to be observed by man nor beast! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. I chose Newton's law of gravity because it's easy to explicitly exhibit this impossibility.
Same holds true for any scientific law.

By "easy to explicitly exhibit", I meant "easy to explicitly exhibit in this thread"

For may theories of physics, I don't think that this is true, because of the technical background to understand quantitative predictions of other theories.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gravity-see the 'Be Careful What You Wish For' thread. In 'O' level physics the teacher asked if gravity existed or could the sun be the 'nucleus' of the solar system and the planets 'electrons'. He was a bloke that could make you think. Our biology teacher could also make you think, usually rude thoughts about her. Our chemistry teacher made you think too, usually 'how far back do I need to stand to be safe?'

Homeopathy: no matter how much you dilute the truth some mug will believe in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.