Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

First attempt at DS imaging. M42


Redpaul

Recommended Posts

I've had my telescope for a few weeks now so thought I'd borrow my brother-in-law's Canon d60 and give a bash at M42. I have the Skywatcher 200p and EQ5 Goto Pro so I know I'm at the lower end of AP but thought I'd give it a go anyway.

I only had a few minutes last night so this is only 6x30 secs and 6x20 secs plus darks.

I just used the default Deep Sky Stacker settings plus a few tweaks with levels and curves.

Any advice on how I could improve it gratefully accepted.

6763110767_9c2844f478_z.jpg

Great Orion Nebula (M42) by Paul S Wharton, on Flickr

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very creditable first go :). M42 is actually pretty tricky to capture, ironically because it is so bright. You don't need long and you can easily burn out the Trapezium area (the very bright core). Many people get around this by taking two sets of exposures, with one set of quite short duration to capture the core without burning it out.

Your darks need to be of the same exposure length as your "lights". So for 30 second lights, you need 30 second darks. You need matching darks for each length of exposure you take. So if you took 30x 30 second lights and 30x 10 second lights, you would need a set of 30 second darks and a set of 10 second darks.

I think you'd find taking flats useful, they will help enormously with the vignetting you have in the corners.

Great start though :) And enjoy your journey to the Dark Side! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys :)

First attempt?

Damn.

Cheers.

I've been a keen photographer for a few years and only sold my gear at xmas to fund the 200p so I already had experience in DSLR's. Plus I've spent the 2 years I've been on this forum studying :)

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done. You picked one of the hardest targets in the sky as your first subject. It may be popular but, as Andy says, the dynamic range makes it a bit of a terror.

I used three data sets, 11 seconds, 50 seconds and 5 mins. This is the best way to combine them in my experience; Compositing 2 Different Exposures via Layer Masks

Olly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done. You picked one of the hardest targets in the sky as your first subject. It may be popular but, as Andy says, the dynamic range makes it a bit of a terror.

I used three data sets, 11 seconds, 50 seconds and 5 mins. This is the best way to combine them in my experience; Compositing 2 Different Exposures via Layer Masks

Olly

Thanks Olly

I've added that to my bookmarks.

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.