Jump to content

Banner.jpg.b83b14cd4142fe10848741bb2a14c66b.jpg

ND96 filter


nightfisher

Recommended Posts

If ND96 is a neutral density filter with 96% blockage thaen I would thought it was too dense.

If it is 96% transmission then it stops almost nothing, there is a 4% loss (the same) at an air to glass interface, so a piece of clear glass would reduce by the same amount.

Either way (if 96 = 96% blockage or transmission) then I cannot thing it would be of much use for lunar observing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ND96 is a moon filter, the '96' is nothing to do with light transmission. The ND96 (0.9 or 0.6) Moon filter (The 0.9 and 0.6 by the way refers to the density, the higher the number, the more density. A low density for use with smaller aperture telescopes and a higher density for large apertures, suggest 0.09 for large apertures above 6" and 0.06 for small apertures below 6" - light transmission 13% and 25% respectively), the ND means Neutral Density and therefore optics do not add any false colourization, whereas some Moon filters have a colour bias (usually green).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ND96 is a moon filter, the '96' is nothing to do with light transmission. The ND96 (0.9 or 0.6) Moon filter (The 0.9 and 0.6 by the way refers to the density, the higher the number, the more density. A low density for use with smaller aperture telescopes and a higher density for large apertures, suggest 0.09 for large apertures above 6" and 0.06 for small apertures below 6" - light transmission 13% and 25% respectively), the ND means Neutral Density and therefore optics do not add any false colourization, whereas some Moon filters have a colour bias (usually green).

Robin, thank you for that wealth of information,i fancy trying the 96-06 just to reduce glare slightly, i am not a great fan of moon filters, as you said they tend to add colour to the image, for the price i think i will go ahead with this and see if i like it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.