Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

Nicola Hannah Butterfield

Members
  • Posts

    335
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Nicola Hannah Butterfield

  1. Nicola Hannah Butterfield

    Planets

    I have only ever caught anything but the Moon as small pinpoint lights, though I have caught the moons of Jupiter and Titan using a Canon 40D and an EF 70-210mm f3.5-4.5 lens. so I am entering a new era with the SW 200P and NEQ6 Pro Goto mount, with the view to possible getting the Jupiter Saturn conjunction on the 21/12/2020, I guess I have some time to iron out any problems before then.
  2. From the album: Planets

    Not great a lot of flare, which I tried to get rid of but lost some stars, might have another try later, lens just wasn't up to the job
  3. @JamesFand @Spaced Outthanks for your replies, mount isn;t the issue bar connecting with the comp. and yes @JamesFread alot of it, just wondered if the acro's might have worked in wider configuration
  4. For cheap wider field than my 200P, I can do 300mm on my Canon lenses.
  5. @Dazzyt66Not sure where in Donny you are but it is pretty flat, if you can see Venus you should surely be able to see Mirfak, I can see it in the finder scope well before it is dark. So I currently use, Sirius Mirfak the next one I use is a problem you might have Arcturus is my third, but it only just rising at 19.30UT. so 20.30. There is Procyon to use a replacement for Sirius, along with Regulus 40° above SE horizon. Capella in the east. I am in Upton, so look south over Donny and Barnsley(more west) and Sheffield further away, lovely southern aspect apart from the mentioned towns making where I live a Bortle 6, my best view are east, but a clear view pretty much from E to W,
  6. Another first galaxy M106 and a new way to avoid outside, well almost
  7. From the album: Galaxies

    This another first both in terms of galaxies and the fact I was using remote desktop from the bedroom. This is just lights and darks approx 60x 60s iso500
  8. These two where amongst my first images just over two weeks ago, seems to me you know different stuff to me, but at the end of the day it about images, The flats darks bias will come.
  9. Too full a frame on the current set up, to much vignetting
  10. I might not have the mount computer controlled yet, but just about got everything else connect, well the bit's I have that can be. Remote screen grab of BackyardEos operating in the shaed
  11. Well if nothing else I can at least now control the mount via the handset from the shed, and I won't need to go to the mount to adjust for any drift (hopefully)
  12. That was taken on the upper patio, sheltered from next doors bathroom light, most of the rest of the stuff in a more open space of the garden, are showing light and dark areas that can't be removed by flats, so I have been thinking this morning if it is due to excessive light, hitting the focus tube, our southern aspect has an industrial site about 2 miles away, and looking back north is next doors bathroom window, lets put it this way I don't need extra light to adjust stuff, so it is possible its effecting the the light, i am going to see if I can make a dew shield to try and block any extra light, if the light patterns are better it will confirm I think thats is what is causing the patterns.
  13. I am a bortle 6 and I did this the first evening I got the NEQ6 mount, 40 2s exposures @iso1600 on my Canon 6D.
  14. From the album: Star Clusters

    Taken the very first evening I got the NEQ6 mount, 40x 2's subs as it wasn't aligned, 40x 2s subs @ISO1600
  15. @grievousIf your focuser 2" adaptor is like my 200P one it should be threaded to a T2 mount, other wise something like this https://www.rothervalleyoptics.co.uk/rother-valley-optics-t2-nosepiece-adaptor-125.html into the T2 mount, but chances are you will then need to use the barlow to acheive focus.
  16. I just redid it with some flats, but because the tracking was off so much not really usable, there was a lot more in it.
  17. Thanks 160 30's subs, just couldn't get tracking right last night. I guess I won't be capturing that anytime soon. It's actually quite a tight drop from a Canon 6D
  18. This is a another first, and whilst I didn't get the computer talking with the scope, I did get the camera working, so short exposures and a ISO a bit high.
  19. From the album: Galaxies

    I had hoped this would have been better than this, however I still can't connect scope to comp though I did get the camera connected up, so at least I can sit in the shed whilst it's taking images.
  20. @michael.h.f.wilkinson Thank you. I was using a Sky Watcher 200P on NEQ6 Pro mount, and a Canon6D, I was going to try the40D but having thought I had charged the battery it was flat. I can't say my rendition of M101 was as good mind.
  21. This is ny first attempt and only my third night with the new mount, I couldn't get 60's subs, so did 30's x130 of them.
  22. From the album: Galaxies

    My first attempt at M104, 139 30's subs stacked in DSS, couldn't seem to track for 50's when I did this.
  23. @Louis D Sorry I get tunnel vision sometimes. I will withdraw unless something constructive to say.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.