Jump to content

NLCbanner2024.jpg.2478be509670e60c2d6efd04834b8b47.jpg

david_taurus83

Members
  • Posts

    3,941
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by david_taurus83

  1. When I first started I got a modified Canon 600D. I soon found out anything over 30s was pointless. I bought a Skytech CLS CCD clip in filter. It was cheaper than the Astronomik which is well regarded. See comparison below. Canon 50mm lens f1.8. 10s images. I'd say get a filter and at least try it out.

    IMG_0314.thumb.JPG.417f2c0d982b59abfa854901804bf37b.JPG

    IMG_0311.thumb.JPG.0f9839ab70f011d5716090dcc0d84f37.JPG

    • Like 1
  2. What scope do you have? I really struggled with a Newt when I started as so much stray light can get into the tub. Since going with a refractor I've been able to shoot from home now. Granted, I have a mono camera and use an IDAS D2 with LRGB filters so better at blocking out the light pollution. See attached. That's facing south and i was still able to pull off a decent Orion last year.

    20190813_215644.jpg

    M42_SCNR.jpg.c6e9106952facbdc6400fa8eb1125367.jpg

    • Like 2
  3. Theres a little arrow penciled onto the edge of the filters showing which way to point them. I have the same set by the way. Very close to parfocal. Only issue I've found is the halos on bright stars with the OIII. Regarding the L or C, I believe the L has UV and IR cut where the C is just that, a Clear filter that passes all wavelengths. Personally I shoot with the L and my LPS is permanently mounted in front of the flattener. Even for narrowband. To remove it means taking the image train apart. So i just shoot longer subs lol

    20181208_160906.jpg

    • Thanks 1
  4. I setup my laptop about 6m from my scope in the hallway one night and loaded a blank black screen on Autocad. I generated a hatched area with small dots to replicate stars. I twiddled and tweaked all night trying to get a perfect flat field. Looking at the actual field test  results I got on the second page below, I wish I'd left the bloody thing alone after that compared to what I'm currently getting in the corners!!! Its a road to madness! I'd rather image the Squid Nebula!

     

    https://stargazerslounge.com/topic/325405-field-flatness-of-refractor/

  5. Take your flat dark frames, integrate them into a master flat dark. Exactly the same as your longer dark frames. Then in image calibration of the flat frames, in the master dark tab, select your master flat dark and apply to your flats. The same as you select a master dark and apply to your lights. Once the flats have had the master flat dark subtracted, you stack the new calibrated flats into a master flat for use on your lights.

  6. I think you've got some really nice data there considering its just over an hours worth. You are probably pushing the limits of the flattener with your 6D but apart from the corners and edges the stars look nice and round. I stacked in DSS with the standard settings and I got something similar to your stack with just the light frames. I set the star detection slider to 89% and ticked the box to reduce noise. This gave me a figure of around 250 stars. It might sound silly but you didn't accidentally mix your flat frames into the light frames tab? I don't know whats happened your stack above with calibration frames!

     

    I done a quick process in Pixinsight. The difficulty with this object is its within a dense starfield so it kind of washes out the nebulosity.  We are used to seeing beautiful narrowband images of this but Ha and OIII filters really make the supernova material stand out. I've never been good at processing OSC images but I've managed to reduce the stars a bit. I reckon if you were to add another 3 or 4 hours worth you'd have a brilliant image with a bit of careful processing!

     

    Autosave_ABE.thumb.jpg.487adfc5849de9fba04c0fde6c053a7c.jpg

     

    Autosave_ABE2.thumb.jpg.eb7ddfc0446692f20e2b3c8b078f02f9.jpg

     

    Starless.thumb.jpg.94f28eaef624411be635d32f19f678c1.jpg

    Autosave.tif

    • Thanks 1
  7. Well just when I thought I had everything nailed down, issues and drama. I had trouble with the ASI1600. If i interrupted the imaging plan for whatever reason, Kstars would freeze and hang. I was running off the laptop and connected to the RPi via my home network. Also a couple of occasions where the image download froze. I switched to VNC and worked off the RPi itself but again, issues with image downloads and Kstars would shut its down on the Pi. See a couple of test images. Its like 2 images in 1. Clouds ruined anything i could capture anyway so hence the reason for no detail. Meridian flip also failed. I had set it to 0.2 hours past the flip. It initiated after an image was captured but the mount didnt move. The image plan then restarted but again Kstars froze and I had to shut everything down and restart. Running the latest version 3.3.3 on both Linux laptop and RPi. 

    NGC 7000_Light_SII_900_secs_2019-08-11T00-42-30_002.jpg

    NGC 7000_Light_SII_900_secs_2019-08-11T00-59-11_003.jpg

  8. 2 minutes ago, Davey-T said:

    Not sure if there are any pitches without electric hook ups, there was some talk of all pitches having them.

    Dave

    Thanks, your correct. I've just re-read the first page:

     

    There are no longer non-electric pitches available (last year only one was booked so this year everything is electric).

     

     

  9. Ok. I'd only press Sync once in CdC. By pressing it in APT as well you may have added a second alignment point to EQMod on the same position which might confuse things. I plate solve and sync in APT but if I was aligning on stars, planets or the moon I'd sync in CdC. It shouldnt matter which one you use as both just give an alignment point to EQMod and that's what points the scope. But I wouldnt sync twice on the same target.

  10. Do you have Sharpcap Pro? It has a Samrt Histogram routine where it will take images of your sky conditions and recommend some exposure times, gain and offset settings based on your cameras read noise. It's very good. I have used it to determine that around 90s at a gain close to or around unity is good for LRGB where I am and around 10 minutes for narrowband. It tends to recommend a low offset for the ASI1600. I ignore this and set offset to 60 and gain at unity 139. Saves doing loads of different darks. Before you use it you need to run a routine to measure your cameras read noise. Tenner for the year and takes the guesswork out of things. And you get the best polar alignment method available that works in a couple of minutes! Set yourself an hour aside and have a watch of Robin's talk at the Practical Astronomy Show earlier this year.

     

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.